Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SayWut

(153 posts)
19. For the record, Obama did not specifically issue any EO's regarding firearms or gun control
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 01:35 AM
Jan 2013
http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/executive-orders

In his speech to the nation, he spoke of 23 "executive actions"...

These are a few of the 23 executive actions that I’m announcing today. But as important as these steps are, they are in no way a substitute for action from members of Congress. To make a real and lasting difference, Congress, too, must act -- and Congress must act soon. And I’m calling on Congress to pass some very specific proposals right away.


http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/16/remarks-president-and-vice-president-gun-violence


He did however, issue 3 Presidential Memoranda on the issue...

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/16/presidential-memorandum-engaging-public-health-research-causes-and-pre-0

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/16/presidential-memorandum-improving-availability-relevant-executive-branch

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/16/presidential-memorandum-tracing-firearms-connection-criminal-investigati

The difference between the two (executive order, presidential memoranda), is a subtle one, issued for the purpose of being less controversial and easier to swallow.

Another executive tool which has raised many questions is the presidential memoranda. Although they possess a different title than executive orders, it appears as though these instruments are very much alike. Both are undefined, written instruments by which the president directs, and governs actions by, Government officials and agencies. They differ in that executive orders must be published in the Federal Register whereas presidential memoranda are similarly published only if the President determines that they have a "general applicability and legal effect." .... In at least one instance, a federal district court seemed to use the two terms interchangeably.


Basically, for all intents and purposes, a memorandum is an executive order. However, since executive orders are a particularly controversial and politically charged lever of presidential power (the mere mention of them has inspired talk of impeachment among some of Congress's more firebrand Republicans), it's important to note that they (or something exactly like them) comprised only three of the items on Obama's list of 23 "executive actions."


http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/01/obama-23-executive-orders-actions-gun-control.html

So, are these 3 "Presidential Memoranda" unconstitional?
IMHO, no (disclaimer, I'm neither a Constitutional scholar or lawyer, and for that matter neither am I a Western sheriff or talk show Reverend).

They're simply instructions/orders to the relevant agencies of the Executive branch to carry out new guidelines.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This Arizona Sheriff on A...»Reply #19