General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If The Dems Made A Concerted Effort To Appeal To Rural Voters What Would You Recommend They Do?.... [View all]Lydia Leftcoast
(48,223 posts)Remember the reason we don't have a public option? Because the Blue Dogs shot it down, and Obama for some reason felt it was more important to kowtow to those corporate lackeys than to please the much more numerous progressive caucus.
No, I was thinking more along the lines of Peter DeFazio, who gets re-elected in a mostly rural Oregon district, despite being about as left as Democrats get on economic issues, just because he always votes against gun control.
Or James Oberstar, former Congressman from the Iron Range of Minnesota, who lasted an awfully long time by being left on foreign policy (opposed the Central America interventions) and economics (strongly pro-labor) while always voting against abortion.
Paul Wellstone managed to be popular with farmers, veterans, Native Americans, urban African-Americans, and white ex-hippies while being on the left edge of the Democratic Party. And if you think that Minnesota is always left, then I have two words for you: Michelle Bachmann.
I don't define Democrats just by behavioral issues, because those that run as "pro-business, anti-government, strong defense" Democrats come awfully close to being in bed with the Libertarians, who are all for personal choice in everyday life but think business can do no wrong and government is bad except when it's funding the military.
But if a Democrat is thoroughly populist in their economics, then I can give them some leeway on behavioral issues.