Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mia

(8,480 posts)
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 08:02 PM Jan 2013

Watching TV on web is disrupting cable, broadcast worlds [View all]

http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/01/26/3201660/watching-tv-on-web-is-disrupting.html

Veteran programmer Rob Barnett recently attended a breakfast meeting of television executives where the talk turned, as it almost always does these days, to “disruption,” the industry buzzword for the way new technology is upsetting the TV applecart. From somewhere down the table, he heard a question: “Has anybody here cut the cord?” — that is, dropped cable service in favor of just watching TV through the Internet? Barnett shrugged and raised his hand. “Mine was the only one,” he recalls. “But when it went up, I saw beads of sweat break out on the foreheads of some of the guys across the table.”

When Barnett and 5,000 or so others gather Monday for the National Association of Television Program Executives (NATPE) convention at the Fontainebleau Hotel on Miami Beach, there will be plenty of sweaty foreheads, some acquisitive smiles and — perhaps most numerous — blank looks of confusion. Not since cable turned the old three-channel TV universe on its head in the late 1970s has the industry been in such a state of disoriented befuddlement.

New technologies that give viewers more say in what they watch, where they watch and how much they pay for it are great for consumers. But they’re inducing a collective nervous breakdown among industry executives, who have to figure out new ways to make money in a business facing serious threats to its traditional sources of revenue — advertising and cable-TV subscriptions....

But the biggest tremors came from the Internet, which is threatening to remake television as thoroughly as it already has the newspaper and music industries, by letting viewers bypass cable to watch shows online.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/01/26/3201660/watching-tv-on-web-is-disrupting.html#storylink=cpy
79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just today I had someone beg me to find an online stream for Downton Abbey Season 2 Fumesucker Jan 2013 #1
Where do I go? DURHAM D Jan 2013 #3
Try this Fumesucker Jan 2013 #5
Thank you. DURHAM D Jan 2013 #9
Thanks. UnrepentantLiberal Jan 2013 #43
PBS is running the current season, full episodes Warpy Jan 2013 #13
Wish I could give some brownies... mia Jan 2013 #4
Here Fumesucker Jan 2013 #6
Thanks! n/t mia Jan 2013 #7
What will disrupt the industry is the ability to pay for only the channels you want. n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2013 #2
There won't be channels. Try just paying for the shows you want. TransitJohn Jan 2013 #27
EBooks are doing likewise to the publishing industry daleo Jan 2013 #53
Intel's a la carte TV is going to destroy the cable monopolies. And about time, too. Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #8
Could this "single industry" have one owner? n/t mia Jan 2013 #49
Not unless the RIAA corporate types win forever. If that happens, and they manage to wrest Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #54
I imagined it. mia Jan 2013 #66
And the Catholic Church has been replaced by the Corporate Church. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #75
Roku's still a little glitchy but quite adequate & so much boring regressive JUNK on network tv. patrice Jan 2013 #10
I use ROKU on two tv's. ananda Jan 2013 #16
I use Roku + OTA DTV, couldn't be more pleased. n/t RKP5637 Jan 2013 #30
We love our ROKU and we have basic Cable which we hardly watch KoKo Jan 2013 #36
We did. And with the new booster antenna, we get all the networks and PBS plus tsuki Jan 2013 #68
yeah, I noticed that mockmonkey Jan 2013 #65
Broadcast and cable will always have places in rural or semi rural areas Warpy Jan 2013 #11
Satellite Has Become Very Popular In Rural Areas... KharmaTrain Jan 2013 #14
Oh you poor souls! longship Jan 2013 #12
I get good reception for major networks with rabbit ears. mia Jan 2013 #17
I have no bandwidth for YouTube. longship Jan 2013 #18
Living in a national forest makes it all worthwhile! mia Jan 2013 #19
Except for today, when I am snowed in. longship Jan 2013 #21
Using Opera? green for victory Jan 2013 #31
I'm in the suburbs of Detroit.... llmart Jan 2013 #22
I am watching Commissario Brunetti (in subtitled German) on MHz longship Jan 2013 #23
We only got about an inch or so last night..... llmart Jan 2013 #24
You can get Brunetti on MHZ? KoKo Jan 2013 #35
It is set, and filmed in Venice. longship Jan 2013 #38
Sadly...they MHz wants $4.99 an episode to watch Brunetti. It's a bit steep KoKo Jan 2013 #79
Let Me Wax Nostalgic. It's Kind of Sad in A Way. dballance Jan 2013 #15
anyone have apple tv 2? shanti Jan 2013 #20
I do actually. They're great little devices. Initech Jan 2013 #37
question: shanti Jan 2013 #56
Not completely. You can browse streaming content like Youtube and Pandora though. Initech Jan 2013 #58
Comcast might want to try lowering their rates... when it hit $80/month, I downgraded, big time! reformist2 Jan 2013 #25
I have no cable or even antenna yet I have thousands of hours of programming available for streaming Bjorn Against Jan 2013 #26
If they don't like people ditching broadcast maybe they could find kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #28
When over half of TV (cable or OTA) is nothing but reality shows DJ13 Jan 2013 #29
I watch lots of Roku and Amazon Prime streaming Lex Jan 2013 #32
Funny how "remake" actually means "destroy." WinkyDink Jan 2013 #33
Remember when you had to buy the album to get the one or two songs you wanted? Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #34
"...what happened to the former will happen to the latter." mia Jan 2013 #73
When cable first went in, Le Taz Hot Jan 2013 #39
Yes, cable seems to have more commercial time than I notice on my regular TV. mia Jan 2013 #40
Network decay littleswan Jan 2013 #41
Interesting... mia Jan 2013 #42
Discovery and TLC started going to hell around 2000. Odin2005 Jan 2013 #59
What irritates me to no end is the way infomercials have appeared to take over.... OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #44
Some infomercials still pass for news. mia Jan 2013 #48
Some pass for programing tabbycat31 Jan 2013 #57
Thanks for the example. mia Jan 2013 #70
Bundling is their issue. They should have gone to a la carte years ago. distantearlywarning Jan 2013 #45
This. Earth_First Jan 2013 #46
Starve the Beast. Cut your cable today. Berlum Jan 2013 #47
That's just an awful shame tabasco Jan 2013 #50
Fuck cable DainBramaged Jan 2013 #51
+1. A vast realm of overpriced boring propaganda and marketing babble. nt bemildred Jan 2013 #52
No cable, no tears, no problem! RetroGamer1971 Jan 2013 #55
Great bumper sticker! n/t mia Jan 2013 #64
99.9% of Cable is shit. Odin2005 Jan 2013 #60
Haven't had cable in over 2 years. Don't miss it. NYC Liberal Jan 2013 #61
They quit offering basic in my area. Now you have to get a package, I think. They offer a cheaper Honeycombe8 Jan 2013 #67
Thanks to TV shows on DVD and DVRs I haven't watched regularly scheduled programs in 10 years! Initech Jan 2013 #62
I used to love cable in the 1980s and 1990s Lydia Leftcoast Jan 2013 #63
Hulu Plus mockmonkey Jan 2013 #69
Can do without Hulu Plus. mia Jan 2013 #71
They should be worried bhikkhu Jan 2013 #72
The public library has lots of videos too. mia Jan 2013 #74
Corporations hate the free market. redgreenandblue Jan 2013 #76
cable is doing itself in with its ridiculous prices Skittles Jan 2013 #77
Haven't had cable for 8 years. MadrasT Jan 2013 #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Watching TV on web is dis...