Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

okaawhatever

(9,565 posts)
27. I agree with your position on how we need to get our act together now. I'm starting to work on that
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:01 AM
Jan 2013

next week. But back to the case. From all the articles i've read, Obama did not expect to lose that. The only problem they thought may arise is the time 3 days. Bush had made an appt. during a 10 day recess and I guess the dems took that to court. The court said any time over 3 days was legal. I think because the constitution says they can't go more than 3 days without calling a recess. I guess Obama went 3 days and a couple of hours. But anyway, the Judge gave an incredibly poor activist opinion. The reason responsible papers are talking about his doing away with 150 yrs of history is because he said the only recess during which a President can appoint is during THE recess, like the one between the 112th and 113th congress. He also added, though he wasn't asked to that the President can only appoint positions that have become vacant during the recess. The third judge wouldn't go along with that portion. Anyway, we can't rest on our laurels. The GOP is undoing this country. In Kansas, they're trying to switch the method of judicial appointments from a merit system they have to governor appointments. They're trying to remove all opposition to their radical policies. It's sickening. I'm up for a good fight between now and 2016, sound like you are too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh, wonderful. CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2013 #1
Can't this decision be appealed? nt brush Jan 2013 #17
Of course it can . Igel Jan 2013 #21
David Sentelle is the poster boy for right wing judicial activism. Historic NY Jan 2013 #2
This was not ONE JUDGE, this was a unanimous decision of a 3-judge panel. elleng Jan 2013 #3
Sentelle was the senior judge. All 3 were republican appointees and the 3rd judge didn't affirm the okaawhatever Jan 2013 #4
Any judge a Bush recess appointee? no_hypocrisy Jan 2013 #5
recess appointments only last until the end of the next session of Congress onenote Jan 2013 #7
Cordray has just been nominated again by Obama n/t malaise Jan 2013 #28
Correct. Unfortunately, that doesn't extend his appointment onenote Jan 2013 #32
I Researched That DallasNE Jan 2013 #20
Thanks for the answer. no_hypocrisy Jan 2013 #30
Just ignore the ruling and do it anyway bluestateguy Jan 2013 #6
The court's order vacates a single decision onenote Jan 2013 #9
OMG! freshwest Jan 2013 #8
A good friend of moman Jan 2013 #10
This is what the constitution says on that Old Codger Jan 2013 #11
Is he 100 years old yet? Reagan appointed him? marble falls Jan 2013 #12
He's 69. He was appointed by Reagan in 1987 when he was 43. onenote Jan 2013 #33
He could be on the bench 10 or more years. marble falls Jan 2013 #34
Whatever... SoapBox Jan 2013 #13
kick samsingh Jan 2013 #14
That Ken Starr business was particularly nasty starroute Jan 2013 #15
And a little more starroute Jan 2013 #16
Wow, read the whole article. It seems like the federalist society was the early tea party. nt okaawhatever Jan 2013 #18
recess Takket Jan 2013 #19
There are three "actors" involved. Igel Jan 2013 #22
K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2013 #23
This was an easy one to call. No Repub judge was going to turn on Bush and no Dem DogPawsBiscuitsNGrav Jan 2013 #24
Personally, I am shocked by this! Ian Iam Jan 2013 #25
Sabatoge, 3rd party John Anderson and fracture allowed Reagan in graham4anything Jan 2013 #26
I agree with your position on how we need to get our act together now. I'm starting to work on that okaawhatever Jan 2013 #27
So every president from George Washington B Calm Jan 2013 #29
No surprise here. n/t AverageJoe90 Jan 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge who ruled Obama vio...»Reply #27