Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

garybeck

(10,085 posts)
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 02:31 PM Jan 2013

Bernie Sanders on why he voted NO for fillibuster reform [View all]

(copied from email sent by Bernie to constituents)

-----

Last week Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent member of the Democratic caucus, was the only member of that caucus to vote NO on the so-called filibuster reform package passed in the U.S. Senate.

Below is Bernie’s statement on why he voted NO.

Thank you for your interest.

-Ben

Ben Eisenberg
Friends of Bernie Sanders

-----

January 24, 2013
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

This country faces major crises in terms of the economy and unemployment, the deficit, global warming, health care, campaign finance reform, education and a crumbling infrastructure – to name a few. In my view, none of these problems will be effectively addressed so long as one senator can demand 60 votes to pass legislation. The rule changes adopted today are a step forward in making the operations of the Senate more efficient and expeditious. They are not enough.

Most Americans grew up believing that in America the majority rules. That is not the case in the Senate. For many years now, especially since President Obama has been in office, it has taken 60 votes to pass any significant piece of legislation. When Lyndon Johnson was majority leader in the 1950s, he filed cloture to end a filibuster only once. Majority Leader Reid has filed cloture 390 times.

The Senate is not the House and the minority party must be treated with respect and given the opportunity to offer amendments and make their case in opposition. A minority must not, however, be allowed to permanently obstruct the wishes of the majority. That is not democracy. That is a perversion of democracy.

In my view, if a senator or a group of senators are strenuously opposed to legislation they have the right and duty to come to the floor and, for as long as they want, engage in a talking filibuster by explaining to the American people the reasons for their objection. They should not, however, continue to have the right to abuse arcane Senate rules to block a majority of senators from acting on behalf of the American people.


61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wish He Were My Senator SoCalMusicLover Jan 2013 #1
He's mine and loving it! Auntie Bush Jan 2013 #21
Mine too and like you loving it - and Vermont itself karynnj Jan 2013 #34
I wish ALL the senators were as reasonable as Bernie. loudsue Jan 2013 #33
I wish he were President. Or on the cabinet. grahamhgreen Jan 2013 #36
Can you just see/hear the heads exploding if Obama ever tried to get Sanders confirmed for anything? Auntie Bush Jan 2013 #42
Not that Obama would try very hard. truedelphi Jan 2013 #43
The last person in Washington representing the People. Scuba Jan 2013 #2
no, he's not. He's my Senator and I couldn't be gladder but cali Jan 2013 #15
True that tavalon Jan 2013 #18
You're right of course. Scuba Jan 2013 #26
Bernie's one of an all-too-rare breed. Plucketeer Jan 2013 #35
In your opinion, which other Senators represent the 99%? merrily Jan 2013 #51
Perhaps he is not the only one dotymed Jan 2013 #30
Sanders no longer claims to be a Democratic Socialist. merrily Jan 2013 #52
At first, I gave Reid a pass on this watered-down filibuster reform. Now... TheProgressive Jan 2013 #3
Harry Reid isn't weak. UnrepentantLiberal Jan 2013 #8
Weak or Blue Dog... TheProgressive Jan 2013 #10
He represents his caucus. merrily Jan 2013 #53
It is a bit delusional to blame only Sen Reid. He is the choice of the DEmocrats in the Senate. rhett o rick Jan 2013 #40
Exactly. truedelphi Jan 2013 #44
Bingo. One of his priorities is making sure they don't look bad. merrily Jan 2013 #54
Bernie is right. n/t Still Sensible Jan 2013 #4
As usual. Squinch Jan 2013 #5
"That is not democracy. That is a perversion of democracy." Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2013 #6
With respect, we live in a republic and not a democracy. The elites rhett o rick Jan 2013 #41
Well... Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2013 #46
I appreciate the links. Dont you have comments?? nm rhett o rick Jan 2013 #47
Yes. I hereby comment that I agree with the gist of the points made at the links. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2013 #49
I am a little confused by your comment. I am sure it's me. rhett o rick Jan 2013 #50
You thanked my for the links, but apparently didn't read them. So, thank you for any future Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2013 #60
Strange reaction. You provided links with no comment. I had already stated my opinion. rhett o rick Feb 2013 #61
I also originally gave Reid a pass, now I want him recalled Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #7
Enjoy your stay; greiner3 Jan 2013 #9
We either demand better or give up Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #17
I dont buy what ever your selling. Nice try. nm rhett o rick Jan 2013 #48
Change a few words and your post sounds like something..... OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #56
I also like dogs. You know who else liked dogs? Hitler! Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #57
Hmmmm. Looks like I struck a nerve.... OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #58
Yeah, you did somewhat. I dislike those kinds of purity challenges... Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #59
"gave Reid a pass"?? pocoloco Jan 2013 #12
I guess. He used to be my Senator a while back... Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #16
I really wish Bernie was my senator. Third Doctor Jan 2013 #11
You tricked me...I read "Filibuster REFORM," not "Reid-McConnell Scam Bullshit." Atman Jan 2013 #13
I agree with Senator Sanders, but ProSense Jan 2013 #14
Yep. And as great as Bernie is, his explanation loses some of its power onenote Jan 2013 #27
K&R woo me with science Jan 2013 #19
Reform would make it far too easy for Senate Progressives to garner 51 votes. NorthCarolina Jan 2013 #20
Biden/Sanders 2016!!! Clinton/Sanders 2016!!!! Sander/Grayson 2016!!!! Nanjing to Seoul Jan 2013 #22
When Republicans controlled the Senate JEB Jan 2013 #23
They cannot find their cahones. 4dsc Jan 2013 #25
Cojones. n/t Comrade Grumpy Jan 2013 #29
They need to look in a banksters pocket...n/t dotymed Jan 2013 #31
With the gerrymandered House districts, it takes more than a majority to win the House, as well! grahamhgreen Jan 2013 #24
DEMs use GOP instransience as cover to enact right-of-center agenda. blkmusclmachine Jan 2013 #28
They are just following corporate orders...n/t dotymed Jan 2013 #32
Same reason he's not a democrat? FreeBC Jan 2013 #37
Pussy is not to blame for much in the U.S. Senate. merrily Jan 2013 #55
Good Cop vs Bad Cop OFFTHEWALL Jan 2013 #38
When Goldman, or Exxon, or UnitedHealth give money... Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #39
You are absolutely right. olegramps Jan 2013 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders on why he ...