Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So the new immigration bill would increase visas for high tech jobs. How will this help us again? [View all]pampango
(24,692 posts)33. What does "TL;DNR version: you gotta exploit SOMEBODY!" mean?
American anti-immigrant sentiments have historically been directed at:
Europeans in the 17th Century;
In 1798 the Alien and Sedition Acts limited the ability of immigrants, especially from France and Ireland, to gain full political rights ...
Catholics in the 19th century;
In 1854, the 'American Party', which was especially hostile to the immigration of Irish Catholics ...
In Charlestown, Massachusetts, a mob attacked and burned down a Catholic convent in 1834 (no one was injured). In the 1840s, small scale riots between Catholics and Protestants took place in several American cities. In Philadelphia in 1844, for example, a series of assaults on Catholic churches and community centers resulted in the loss of lives ...
Anti-Catholic sentiment experienced a revival in the 1890s, led by Protestant Irish immigrants hostile to Catholic immigration.
The Chinese;
In the 1870s Chinese immigrants were attacked in the western states, driving them out of smaller towns.
The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was the first of many acts of Congress to limit the flow of immigrants into the U.S.
Anti-immigrant sentiment experienced a resurgence in the late 20th century, this time directed at illegal aliens, largely Mexican resulting in the passage of new penalties against illegal immigration in 1996.
...anyone who questions this poster may be a racist. - I am not calling anyone racist or anti-Catholic or anti-Irish. If you think that a look at anti-immigrant sentiment in American history is not relevant to current immigration reform proposals, just say so and move on. The ol' "Those in favor of immigration are always calling the rest of us 'racists' mantra gets a little old, especially when there are just as many non-racial factors listed in my post about historical sentiments about immigration as there are about race. (I noticed that you chose not to go with "anyone who questions this poster may be a anti-Catholic or anti-Irish." Guess that doesn't have the same pizzazz.)
Just because anti-immigrant sentiments have historically been centered on issues of race, religion and ethnicity (if you have evidence to the contrary I would love to see it) does not mean that everyone (either in the past or today) who opposes immigration does so for any of those reasons. I apologize if my post about an inconvenient aspect of American history offended you.
I hope that makes it clear that I don't think you are a racist.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So the new immigration bill would increase visas for high tech jobs. How will this help us again? [View all]
still_one
Jan 2013
OP
sorry, not corporations introducing this bill. it's dems and repubs in congress nt
msongs
Jan 2013
#11
Correct. On whose behalf do you suppose this little provision was introduced??
MrSlayer
Jan 2013
#12
the dems and pubs are bribed to introduce it. yes, bribed, because our system is one of legal
HiPointDem
Jan 2013
#18
It will help us by providing more low income service jobs for Americans.
DogPawsBiscuitsNGrav
Jan 2013
#5
I want to see the undocumented workers get help, but I absolutely do not want to see
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#6
It Is Like What I Posted In The Past ---- WAGE PARITY WITH THE THIRD WORLD
TheMastersNemesis
Jan 2013
#8
Sounds a lot like my situation. After 20 plus years they let us go. I too found a job, but took a
still_one
Jan 2013
#65
Employees won't just leave unless the pay in their job and/or the working conditions are
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#76
But the interest in unemployed Americans in finding jobs should be more highly considered
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#89
When there are or were plenty of jobs, H1-B visas were not such a controversial subject.
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#75
as with everything, they start with those least able to defend themselves, with fewest allies,
HiPointDem
Jan 2013
#19
All immigrants are either children, retired/disabled or working age adults. If they are working age,
pampango
Jan 2013
#20
I knew that but it is an important distinction, so thanks for pointing it out.
pampango
Jan 2013
#22
H-1Bs are non-immigrant visas that allow the holder to seek permanent residence
WilmywoodNCparalegal
Jan 2013
#24
The H1-B visas bring in people to fill jobs that Americans could be trained or are capable of doing.
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#80
There is no 'regular' visa that does not leave them at the whim of an employer
WilmywoodNCparalegal
Jan 2013
#70
I don't think that you're going to get a coherent answer to any immigration
amandabeech
Jan 2013
#43
We call working class people "racists" for daring to ask this question. Why are white collar
Romulox
Jan 2013
#29
H1Bs provide one of the few skilled labor pathways to citizenship in the United States
ponsheki
Jan 2013
#37
That isn't what has been happening. There are plenty of highly skilled people here who want to work
still_one
Jan 2013
#61
Because they pay Social Security and Medicare taxes but don't receive benefits
Recursion
Jan 2013
#42
Because skilled immigrants who earn good salaries buy cars, which helps car dealers.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2013
#60
An enormous group of engineers and scientists are in their later forties and fifties.
bluestate10
Jan 2013
#64