Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
5. Err....yes they could, if they wanted.
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 02:03 PM
Jan 2013

There is no federal law prohibiting cruelty to animals that don't also involve interstate transport. There are laws protecting farm animals as they are transported and sold across state lines, and there are laws that make the interstate transport of fighting animals illegal, but there are no federal laws governing the welfare of non-farm animals within the boundaries of the individual states. Torturing a pet to death is perfectly legal under federal law. It's an illegal and prosecutable offense because all 50 states have passed laws making it illegal. Any one of those states could repeal those laws and theoretically make animal cruelty legal any time they wanted, though I don't think I've ever even heard anyone advocate for doing it.

We passed Prop 4 here in California back in the late 1990's which made it illegal to use any body-contact trap or poison to "hunt" anywhere in the state. Everything from nooses to leg-hold traps were banned by the law. Unfortunately, with the way our nation is structured, this is the only way to prohibit these things. You have to push it state by state.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If this Anti-Trapping pet...»Reply #5