Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Assange to run for Australian senate: WikiLeaks (AFP) [View all]struggle4progress
(125,939 posts)20. You should vote for the fifth option! Here's a link:
... With her October 2012 speech Gillard placed gender at the centre of Australian political discourse in a way that is rare, and perhaps unheard of in a major election ... In recent days the issue was thrown into a tailspin by her partner, Tim Mathieson, encouraging Australian men getting their prostates checked to choose a "small Asian female doctor", thus opening himself to accusations of sexism, racism and, indeed, heightism. But this remains an election where the leaders despite Abbott's attempts to distance himself from the issue are seen as occupying starkly different positions.
Abbott's stance on abortion, for instance he has said that the current rate of abortion is "this generation's legacy of unutterable shame" and as health minister attempted to block access to RU486, the medical alternative to surgical abortion has led to fears that as prime minister he would limit access to options and medical care ...
Australia's election in five subplots: from gender politics to Julian Assange
Julia Gillard's shock call of a 14 September election begins a long and gruelling campaign between two outspoken politicians
Peter Salmon
Thursday 31 January 2013 07.34 EST
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/31/australian-election-five-subplots
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
and links! links are good! plus it's in today's news! some people actually read links and news!
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#3
Aw, c'mon! I offered lots of options: a US conspiracy theory! a heroic image of Julian's
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#7
How clever! An implied personal attack! You must have a lot of intertube experience!
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#9
I'm disappointed no one has taken me up on my list of senators leaving the USA.
freshwest
Jan 2013
#35
I suppose you mean that you don't much care for informative links, since
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#45
You think he'll push through a constitutional amendment or a change in election law before Sept?
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#40
If his dad gets the Wikileaks party going, and the majority want them to be in a coalition, he could
freshwest
Jan 2013
#46
I hope he wins. Then there will be at least one politician who doesn't belong in jaiil.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2013
#22
It's a safer bet that the Brits will continue to do America's dirty work and keep him locked up.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2013
#24
He hasn't been in Her Majesty's custody since Thu 16 Dec 10: he was arrested Tues 7 Dec 10
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#30
Uh-huh. He can leave the embassy and go anywhere without interference..right?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2013
#37
He's jumped bail and is a fugitive. If he leaves the embassy, he should be treated as any other. nt
msanthrope
Jan 2013
#41
There are various theories about why Assange does not leave the embassy. William Blum,
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#43
I know! It's so shamelessly brazen of me! Just who do I think I am, pointing out
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#36
Uh oh. You've incurred the wrath of the folks who still believe Julian Assange.
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2013
#29