Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: good reason not to buy a BMW [View all]Xithras
(16,191 posts)106. Elkann is Chairman, but the Agnelli's own a controlling interest in the company.
Elkann is chairman of the board. The board works for the shareholders. The Agnelli family is the largest single shareholder in the company, owning a third of it outright, and controlling a voting bloc that has effective control over the company.
In other words, Elkann works for the Agnelli's. Aren't corporations awesome?
And, for what it's worth, the remainder of your post simply supports the point I was indirectly trying to make. Boycotting ANY company over their role in a war that ended 67 years ago is stupid, because if you dig hard enough NOBODY is clean. I'm more concerned about what companies are doing TODAY than what they were doing in 1945.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yup, rationalisation, works for you......and the scabs assembling the foreign iron in right to work
DainBramaged
Jan 2013
#38
The fact that BMW builds it US-made cars in a right-to-work state is a better reason to avoid them.
DainBramaged
Jan 2013
#71
Agreed. And right-to-work is something that we, as Americans, have foisted on ourselves.
pampango
Jan 2013
#72
Considering that Ford did more for Hitler than the Quandts ever could have?
Democracyinkind
Jan 2013
#63
Chrysler is also partly owned by the UAW and FIAT scion John Elkann is an American.
MightyMopar
Feb 2013
#105
Elkann is Chairman, but the Agnelli's own a controlling interest in the company.
Xithras
Feb 2013
#106
How many people today have their fortunes that were funded even partially in atrocities?
Glassunion
Jan 2013
#48
better not take Bayer aspirin either, I've heard they have a connection to Nazis. nt
Raine
Jan 2013
#10
The sins of the father sort of thing? I'm not normally so magnanimous, but I won't begrudge them
Ed Suspicious
Jan 2013
#21
Since the thread is back on top, I'll answer, "the difference" for me is to publicize the
UTUSN
Jan 2013
#98
I'd not drive a BMW or a Ford, BUT these people are not descendants of Goebbles at all
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2013
#26
The company built its fortunes on the backs of slave labor. Isn't that enough? jeesh. - n/t
coalition_unwilling
Jan 2013
#52
No, unless you think corporations really are people, fully endowed with thoughts and feelings. (nt)
harmonicon
Jan 2013
#56
Though there is that pesky fact that he didn't know that the car was capable
Luminous Animal
Jan 2013
#41
Harald Quandt was Magda's son from a previous marriage, before Goebbels.
Manifestor_of_Light
Jan 2013
#49
I bet the people you mentioned aren't too big on DuPonts products, either ...
Democracyinkind
Jan 2013
#64
As much as I detest both rich people and NAZIs, the Goebbels family has done nothing wrong
Taverner
Jan 2013
#82
I sat down and figured out that I have owned nothing but Axis vehicles my whole life.
Glassunion
Jan 2013
#100