Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluerthanblue

(13,669 posts)
51. yes, I will.. because
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:47 PM
Jan 2012

NO candidate will ever be the ideal one. And like it or not- a fair amount of people who also live in this country don't see things the way we do- and they also have a say in how we live.

You have a voice- you can use it to ensure that things don't get worse (and no matter how you try and fool yourself into thinking otherwise, any of the republican candidates would be a disaster for this country) or you can proclaim to be 'standing on principal' and choose to allow something completely against everything you stand for to have power.

There is not one single issue that Newt or Mitt proposes that I agree on.

I voted for and worked to elect Pres. Obama in 2008- not because I believed he was a 'messiah' or because I was thrilled with all his stands- (he was clear on his view of Afghanistan, Pakistan military involvement, he did not see universal health care as immediately viable, and not as committed to ensuring marriage equality as I wanted)
but there has never been a candidate in my lifetime who has been ideal. He is among those who have come closest for me.

We live in the real world. We share this country with people who don't agree with many of our ideals.

There is no taking our dolls and tea-set and going home. This is home. Dysfunctional as it may be.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

... elleng Jan 2012 #1
What, are you at a Roman gladitorial event? MadHound Jan 2012 #5
ROFLMAO! graywarrior Jan 2012 #16
No, I would not vote for your fantasy straw man Obama. emulatorloo Jan 2012 #2
I respect what you are saying. I am deeply upset by all you mention BUT he has done a lot of Justice wanted Jan 2012 #3
Your right. But it is the choice of the less evil. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #4
And that is the entire problem encapsulated, MadHound Jan 2012 #6
Well if we are goners than I rather go with the democrats. Republicans will form southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #8
So you are now advocating a big Republican Blow-Out so we can "start fresh" after emulatorloo Jan 2012 #9
So do you regularly take what people say so far out of context, MadHound Jan 2012 #10
Are you kidding? Bobbie Jo Jan 2012 #29
Perhaps you ought to get that checked then MadHound Jan 2012 #30
Then WTF are you advocating? Ohio Joe Jan 2012 #40
That is what you wrote. And your comment about prejudices/filters is classic projection. emulatorloo Jan 2012 #42
we will ALWAYS have a lesser of two evils..if your a Green or a Dem or a Repug or your fantasy party Demonaut Jan 2012 #39
So given the options presented..... Sheepshank Jan 2012 #45
Evil is still evil (nt) bigwillq Jan 2012 #7
Yes, I would, and I will. It's a two party system. (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2012 #11
All the more's the pity, MadHound Jan 2012 #13
A multi-party system is not necessarily any better. Nye Bevan Jan 2012 #14
Do you ProSense Jan 2012 #12
And none of what you say refutes the facts I stated or the point I make MadHound Jan 2012 #18
and you also forgot to include in the OP that Obama puts Carbon Dioxide into the air we breathe... Sheepshank Jan 2012 #46
I agree with everything in your first paragraph-- eridani Jan 2012 #15
Progress is sometimes a slower process than we would want. Amonester Jan 2012 #17
Except we aren't progressing, MadHound Jan 2012 #19
Get it all out of your system, because come the GE ... 11 Bravo Jan 2012 #20
What, you think we've been progressing? MadHound Jan 2012 #22
I said you have choices when you said we haven't. Amonester Jan 2012 #24
No, you're not, because by any rubric you use to measure our society, we're not progressing MadHound Jan 2012 #25
dadt...veterans issues...a pathway to affordable and possible single payer health system Demonaut Jan 2012 #35
So who, in your infinite wisdom, Ineeda Jan 2012 #21
A serious political revolution is the best alternative we can have, MadHound Jan 2012 #23
Where is that 'serious political revolution' alternative? Amonester Jan 2012 #26
That's the trouble, you, like Dems and 'Pugs, only do short term thinking, MadHound Jan 2012 #28
I'm all FOR that. Amonester Jan 2012 #32
Then such short term thinking will gain us nothing MadHound Jan 2012 #33
47-48% of almost a hundred million GE voters disagree with it (they R brainwashed). Amonester Jan 2012 #37
Maybe you were just speaking with the whole "serious political revolution alternative" team. Life Long Dem Jan 2012 #31
oh gawd...another revolution? Sheepshank Jan 2012 #48
I am quite sure I will quaker bill Jan 2012 #27
Fuck Yeah!!! Demonaut Jan 2012 #34
FUD. MineralMan Jan 2012 #36
+1 n/t Sheepshank Jan 2012 #49
+1 tallahasseedem Jan 2012 #50
+1 great white snark Jan 2012 #53
ITS ONLY BEEN 3 YEARS! FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #38
so many inaccuracies Motown_Johnny Jan 2012 #41
For me, the mandatory private insurance was soul-crushing. Romulox Jan 2012 #43
No. Which is why I vote issues not party or candidate. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2012 #44
In a heartbeat. Ikonoklast Jan 2012 #47
yes, I will.. because Bluerthanblue Jan 2012 #51
I have no reasonable alternative at this time, so I hope for the best, Zorra Jan 2012 #52
Over 60,000,000 people will vote for President Obama. great white snark Jan 2012 #54
More saliently, would you? Robb Jan 2012 #55
I was raised in a Democatic household, so I was issued a clothes pin for nose holding Bluenorthwest Jan 2012 #56
Not knowingly ... T S Justly Jan 2012 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you vote for this c...»Reply #51