Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bhikkhu

(10,789 posts)

4. To their small credit, Boeing did wise up a year or so ago

Reply to Yavin4 (Original post)

Fri Feb 1, 2013, 12:15 PM

Feb 2013

...realizing that they were creating far more problems than they were solving with their "distributed manufacturing" model. It takes a very long time to undo a bad decision of that scale!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Boeing Debacle: Seven Lessons Every CEO Must Learn (Offshoring Issues) [View all] Yavin4 Feb 2013 OP

A great excerpt from the article Yavin4 Feb 2013 #1

My experience in IT is it's mostly dialouge and lack of oversight, have to have a technical pm uponit7771 Feb 2013 #2

Japan makes parts, ANA buys 55 787s? godai Feb 2013 #3

I've read other articles that indicated that the choice of contractors amandabeech Feb 2013 #7

To their small credit, Boeing did wise up a year or so ago bhikkhu Feb 2013 #4

Well, the lack of supplier oversight was was borderline criminal Blue_Tires Feb 2013 #6

A certain amount of distribution of manufacturing is necessary to get plane orders JPZenger Feb 2013 #5

Even if the aircraft is years late and still has problems? amandabeech Feb 2013 #8

In my experience, business owners/leaders/whatevers act as though ... LisaLynne Feb 2013 #9

Wait, you mean the cheapest labor isn't necessarily the best idea??? jeff47 Feb 2013 #10