Applebee's official reply

[noamnety]

120. actually, there was personal information.

There was a signature tying a person to a particular location at a particular time.

It's possible that some of their customers don't want to publish that they were there on a particular day or night.

I'm surprised DUers support more invasions of privacy. My impression a few years back was that people had problems with things like the car trackers being installed in leased cars without the driver's knowledge, or cell phones tracking (and publishing?) your location without your consent or knowledge. Or students having to wear tracking ID cards. Or stores selling your information, including your purchasing history, without your knowledge.

We shouldn't have become a society where the left is outraged that people expect a basic level of privacy.

I'm shocked that people here think corporations SHOULD allow their employees to publish their signature and whereabouts without their consent.