General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pitbulls Used to Be Considered the Perfect "Nanny Dogs" for Children -- [View all]aandegoons
(473 posts)Breeders did.
I just don't get this screwed up shit of trying to force others to change their opinion on things that are harmful. If you like the dog get one and dangle your fucking kid above it's jaws. You want to be that type of idiot parent then go right ahead.
To try and mitigate the real danger of certain or all dog breeds is by using a data point from 100 years ago is ignorant in the utmost. Did you know that 200 years ago you could only load a gun with one ball or small group of balls in 15 seconds or more. Of course what the heck does that mean for now? Are guns today unable to shoot twenty children and are totally safe because of that? Did you know 100 years ago bombs could not blow up entire cities? Guppies used to just look like little plain fish. Some dog breeds have gotten healthier and some have gotten more unhealthy.
Really think about it. It's ok to love dogs, it's ok to even love pitbulls or tigers or lions as some people do. It is not ok to try and lie or distort to force others to live with your choice of what is acceptable danger to your children. Be it guns or certain dog breeds.
As a disclaimer I am both a gun owner, a dog owner, and a father of three. Not knowing what any of them are capable of is the worst parenting decision that could ever be made.