General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When Truth Tried to Stop War [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)1. You tried to pretend the IWR did not have conditions attached to the use of force. Not only that, you claimed I tried to revise history then you did that exact thing by trying to pretend the IWR didnt have this clause.
2. After several attempts to get facts from you, you post four links to articles with no text at all included in your post let alone any that disagrees with anything that I said.
3. When called out on that, you post the IWR vote results which are not in dispute by anyone under this OP and are not material to my points that the IWR has a clause that was not met.
4. You claim I do not support the OP when I had, considerably before you asserted that, posted a response to the OP saying K&R and thanking them for posting another piece of the puzzle.
5. After being corrected on #4 you attack my blog when the article I gave you that details my POV on the subject was never posted on my blog, it is on Rob Kall's OpEdNews site.
Again and again, you don't research what you talk about or ignore facts and go off half cocked.
You mad bro?