General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Looks like Anonymous has hacked into the SCOTUS website - pissed about Swartz [View all]tomp
(9,512 posts)I don't i know who orly taitz is but it doesn't matter.
the fact that you label anyone as a "conspiracy theorist" indicates a biased (i.e., warped) view of the world. that you think you can label a person as a person as a conspiracy theorist as your initial premise and win an argument based on that indicates an illogical mind at work.
the term conspiracy theorist has come to mean "loony" or "paranoid" and is often paired with "tin foil hat". this amounts to a blanket dismissal of people who distrust the official stories of world powers and of the u.s. gov't in particular. by definition, if you trust the u.s. gov't version of the facts you have a warped view of the world, because there are hundreds of examples of the u.s. gov't lying to us or keeping secrets from us on crucial questions.
many people, yourself included apparently, are skeptical of skeptics. 9/11 is the classic example: google "9/11 unanswered questions." pick any website and answer the multitude of legitimate unanswered questions. after you do that you can resume calling people conspiracy theorists. the skeptics have it right, you have it wrong.