Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
21. People, Liberals, spoke out about it then too.
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 06:15 PM
Feb 2013

Carey McWilliams was editor of The Nation and prepared a large report with his objections. I don't think it is fair to say that people didn't criticize FDR from the left at the time for the internments.



<snip>

Evacuation Held Proof of Disloyalty

It would be idle, at this late date, to review the pros and cons of mass evacuation were it not for the fact that mass evacuation has placed the entire resident Japanese-American minority under a cloud of suspicion. The fact that evacuation was ordered, for example, is now being cited as proof of the disloyal character of the entire group. Actually, there is no basis whatever in the available evidence for such an inference. It is also interesting to note that some of the groups that were most active in California in urging evacuation of every person of Japanese ancestry from the west coast were, at the same time, strenuously opposed to the evacuation of a single person of Japanese ancestry from Hawaii! Some of these groups, moreover, had a freely acknowledged economic interest in mass evacuation. Immediately after Pearl Harbor, the Shipper-Grower Association of Salinas, California, sent Mr. Austin E. Anson to Washington to lobby for evacuation. "We're charged with wanting to get rid of the Japs for selfish reasons," said Mr. Anson. "We might as well be honest. We do. It's a question of whether the white man lives on the Pacific Coast or the brown man." Saturday Evening Post, May 9, 1942.

Voluntary Removal Fails

At the outset, it was merely the removal of all persons of Japanese ancestry that was contemplated by the authorities. There was no thought, at the time, of internment.

Between February 19 and March 27, 1942, the Japanese were free to depart voluntarily from the area. During this period, 10,231 left Military Area No. 1, but, of this number, 4,825 merely moved into Military Area No. 2. Not only were the Japanese moving too slowly—as viewed by the military—but many of them did not have enough money to leave the area. They did not know where to move, and they were meeting with opposition even while in transit. For example, Governor Payne Ratner of Kansas stated that "Japs are not wanted and not welcome in Kansas" and directed the state police to turn back any Japanese trying to enter the state.
As they sought to retreat eastward, evacuees met with many unpleasant incidents. Signs posted in shops read: "This restaurant poisons rats and Japs"; barber shops carried signs reading "Japs shaved: Not Responsible for Accidents"; signs were placed in automobile windshields reading "Open Season for Japs"; filling stations, restaurants, and hotels refused to serve evacuees. Realizing that some agency would have to be established to assist in evacuation, President Roosevelt, on March 18, 1942, issued Executive Order No. 9102 creating the War Relocation Authority. Early in April, the director of the authority met with the governors of the western states in Salt Lake City. These governors, with one exception, refused to accept responsibility for the maintenance of law and order unless evacuees were placed under military guard. These developments compelled the government to stop further voluntary evacuation and to undertake a program of planned relocation.

<snip>

It's why FDR was a one term president. Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #1
So, election equals morality? n/t malthaussen Feb 2013 #2
You quoted me, right? I said that, right? Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #6
Dunno, I might just have misunderstood you, eh? malthaussen Feb 2013 #9
As in every election, it was a statement that ... Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #11
Most didn't even know of the camps Floyd_Gondolli Feb 2013 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Floyd_Gondolli Feb 2013 #19
I guess we are all hypocrites for failing to condemn something that, in my case, el_bryanto Feb 2013 #3
Remember when Obama said he would close interment camps, I mean gitmo. Arctic Dave Feb 2013 #4
But Gitmo went up for a vote and got defeated, Internment was an Executive Order. JaneyVee Feb 2013 #10
Completely missed the point didn't ya buttercup. Arctic Dave Feb 2013 #14
Buttercup? I thought Gitmo WAS your point. You should have elaborated. I'll get back in the kitchen JaneyVee Feb 2013 #16
Your right! Riftaxe Feb 2013 #18
Yes and Congress followed that with 400+ votes for banning transfers from Gitmo SpartanDem Feb 2013 #22
Gee i wonder why.... Riftaxe Feb 2013 #24
It wasn't really publicized at the time. sadalien Feb 2013 #5
And he's still my favorite President. EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #7
Unless their named Bush? zipplewrath Feb 2013 #17
It was wartime, and he played on prejudices obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #8
I wonder how many Democrats suddenly said it was ok... joeybee12 Feb 2013 #12
There was some protest at the time, malthaussen Feb 2013 #13
I think FDR should have been held accountable for that. Solly Mack Feb 2013 #15
People, Liberals, spoke out about it then too. Starry Messenger Feb 2013 #21
At least that was during a declared war between sovereign states. But even so, have you WinkyDink Feb 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remember how FDR authoriz...»Reply #21