General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I have spent a significant portion of my morning ... [View all]ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)Complain about 'lock-stepping', the DLC, call uncritical supporters of Obama 'groupies' etc.
I also think many of them are, if not well meaning, very frustrated In their attempts to explain to explain their opposition to certain of President Obamas policies.
I have seen what I call the 'two ships passing in the night arguments. Say a well reasoned explanation of why policies are fully supported, met with accusations of lock-stepping,being paid DLC staff, being An 'Obama groupie'. I have seen a poster with well reasoned argument on why a policy is not supported, called a troll or a disrupter.
I took a vacation from here when the anti- Obama vitriolic was to much for me to take, when the persons supporting him were driven into having their own group.
I see it starting again, so I read a little of both, 'sides' find those few who can present an issue in a pragmatic, reasonable light, stay focused on women's issues and hope it doesn't get so ugly again.
This time I'm not leaving---I don't think---but then I don't post all that much or get my only political information here. We lost some very good posters last time.