Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)He was a boy who hadn't seen his father in two years [View all]
Last edited Thu Feb 7, 2013, 05:19 PM - Edit history (1)
[center]
[/center]

Abdulrahman al-Awlaki wasn't on an American kill list. Nor was he a member of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninusla. Nor was he "an inspiration," as his father styled himself, for those determined to draw American blood; nor had he gone "operational," as American authorities said his father had, in drawing up plots against Americans and American interests.
He was a boy who hadn't seen his father in two years, since his father had gone into hiding. He was a boy who knew his father was on an American kill list and who snuck out of his family's home in the early morning hours of September 4, 2011, to try to find him. He was a boy who was still searching for his father when his father was killed, and who, on the night he himself was killed, was saying goodbye to the second cousin with whom he'd lived while on his search, and the friends he'd made. He was a boy among boys, then; a boy among boys eating dinner by an open fire along the side of a road when an American drone came out of the sky and fired the missiles that killed them all.

...
There has been no similar public discussion over the death of Abdulrahman al-Awlaki because there was, until now, no hard information available about the death of Abdulrahman al-Awlaki. A 16-year-old American boy accused of no crimes was killed in American drone attack, and the administration has neither acknowledged his death or acknowledged that it killed him. It has, indeed, done everything it possibly can to avoid saying how and why it killed him, and has answered the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by the ACLU with a blanket insistence that it is not obligated to confirm or deny the existence of the CIA's drone program, much less disclose information about those the drone program has killed.
...
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-death-10470891#ixzz2ABHMgELN
[centre]
[/center]
WASHINGTON -- A 16-year-old American boy killed in an Obama administration drone strike "should have (had) a far more responsible father," Obama campaign senior adviser Robert Gibbs says in a new video released by the group We Are Change.
...
"I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father if they are truly concerned about the well being of their children. I don't think becoming an al Qaeda jihadist terrorist is the best way to go about doing your business," Gibbs, the former White House press secretary, told the interviewer from We Are Change, when asked to justify "an American citizen that is being targeted without due process, without trial -- and, he's underage, he's a minor."
...
"Again, note that this kid wasn't killed in the same drone strike as his father," writes The Atlantic's Conor Friedersdorf. "He was hit by a drone strike elsewhere, and by the time he was killed, his father had already been dead for two weeks. Gibbs nevertheless defends the strike, not by arguing that the kid was a threat, or that killing him was an accident, but by saying that his late father irresponsibly joined al Qaeda terrorists. Killing an American citizen without due process on that logic ought to be grounds for impeachment."

Friedersdorf also notes the distinction that al-Awlaki's son was not killed as a consequence of the strike against the father, but was hit separately. Esquire's Tom Junod covered the son's killing:
...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/24/robert-gibbs-anwar-al-awlaki_n_2012438.html
...
"I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father if they are truly concerned about the well being of their children. I don't think becoming an al Qaeda jihadist terrorist is the best way to go about doing your business," Gibbs, the former White House press secretary, told the interviewer from We Are Change, when asked to justify "an American citizen that is being targeted without due process, without trial -- and, he's underage, he's a minor."
...
"Again, note that this kid wasn't killed in the same drone strike as his father," writes The Atlantic's Conor Friedersdorf. "He was hit by a drone strike elsewhere, and by the time he was killed, his father had already been dead for two weeks. Gibbs nevertheless defends the strike, not by arguing that the kid was a threat, or that killing him was an accident, but by saying that his late father irresponsibly joined al Qaeda terrorists. Killing an American citizen without due process on that logic ought to be grounds for impeachment."

Friedersdorf also notes the distinction that al-Awlaki's son was not killed as a consequence of the strike against the father, but was hit separately. Esquire's Tom Junod covered the son's killing:
He was a boy who hadn't seen his father in two years, since his father had gone into hiding. He was a boy who knew his father was on an American kill list and who snuck out of his family's home in the early morning hours of September 4, 2011, to try to find him. He was a boy who was still searching for his father when his father was killed, and who, on the night he himself was killed, was saying goodbye to the second cousin with whom he'd lived while on his search, and the friends he'd made. He was a boy among boys, then; a boy among boys eating dinner by an open fire along the side of a road when an American drone came out of the sky and fired the missiles that killed them all.
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-death-10470891#ixzz2ABHMgELN
...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/24/robert-gibbs-anwar-al-awlaki_n_2012438.html
God have mercy on innocents around the world, to include within America, who in no way support the crimes taking place right now but are being dragged into them to enrich criminals lusting for profits.
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I would have to say Dwight Eisenhower was the best President in my life time.
xtraxritical
Feb 2013
#73
Surely collateral damage will be held to an acceptable level for only then could
indepat
Feb 2013
#35
16 is almost grown, esp in tribes. He was no "young child." US says he wasn't the target,
Honeycombe8
Feb 2013
#111
Not anymore. He knew by that date that his dad had been killed in a drone attack. He was hardly
Honeycombe8
Feb 2013
#117
If his father had not brought him to Yemen, this would not have happened
Freddie Stubbs
Feb 2013
#75
Nevertheless, he was. I was responding to your post that he was not your normal 16yo. n/t
Mojorabbit
Feb 2013
#11
I am confused. Are you saying he deserved it because of his training and his father?
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#15
Then why did the Press Secretary make that disgusting comment about his father?
tavalon
Feb 2013
#22
Absolutely sick and disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2013
#59
Sure they do, that little sperm should have seen the danger and swam the other way.
Autumn
Feb 2013
#14
Yes, he was meeting with folks that knew his dad that were connected with al Qaeda.
Tx4obama
Feb 2013
#33
This happened well before the last election. Why are you up in arms about it now?
harmonicon
Feb 2013
#34
Where is the culpability for the adults he was with?? He was with known terrorists!
hue
Feb 2013
#39
Hey, don't let actual facts ruin an emotionally manipulating story designed to portray
Yavin4
Feb 2013
#47
Perfectly said. This story unsettles me, but for me, the most important issue is why in hell
Number23
Feb 2013
#49
I know he wasn't targeted. But to be honest, that doesn't make his situation less tragic to me
Number23
Feb 2013
#53
no, but if we had done away with the ground war and used drones it would have cut down
JI7
Feb 2013
#56
Whose innocents? Only the invading soldiers with lethal weapons from our side?
Catherina
Feb 2013
#64
You don't need to be 'concerned' to point out that it was said this kid was collateral damage.
randome
Feb 2013
#89
"should have (had) a far more responsible father" = sick, disgusting. *they* killed him.
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#99
Sad thing is, as Wikileaks revealed, they went after al-Awlaki because OBL was old news
Catherina
Feb 2013
#113