Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
13. We are making enemies much faster than we can kill them. Why?
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 08:21 PM
Feb 2013

From a former CIA person:



Drone attacks create terrorist safe havens, warns former CIA official

Indiscriminate use of drones in Middle East causes too many civilian casualties, warns former CIA counterterrorism head

Paul Harris in New York
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 5 June 2012 15.56 EDT

A former top terrorism official at the CIA has warned that President Barack Obama's controversial drone programme is far too indiscriminate in hitting targets and could lead to such political instability that it creates terrorist safe havens.

SNIP...

Now Robert Grenier, who headed the CIA's counter-terrorism center from 2004 to 2006 and was previously a CIA station chief in Pakistan, has told the Guardian that the drone programme is targeted too broadly. "It [the drone program] needs to be targeted much more finely. We have been seduced by them and the unintended consequences of our actions are going to outweigh the intended consequences," Grenier said in an interview.

Grenier emphasised that the use of drones was a valuable tool in tackling terrorism but only when used against specific identified targets, who have been tracked and monitored to a place where a strike is feasible. However, recent media revelations about Obama's programme have revealed a more widespread use of the strike capability, including the categorising of all military-age males in a strike zone of a target as militants. That sort of broad definition and the greater use of drones has outraged human rights organisations.

The BIJ has reported that drone strikes in Pakistan over the weekend hit a funeral gathering for a militant slain in a previous strike and also may have accidentally hit a mosque. That sort of action adds credence to the claims that the drone campaign is likely to cause more damage by creating anger at the US than it does in eliminating terrorist threats.

"We have gone a long way down the road of creating a situation where we are creating more enemies than we are removing from the battlefield. We are already there with regards to Pakistan and Afghanistan," he said

CONTINUED...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/05/al-qaida-drone-attacks-too-broad



Wish we'd listen to the intelligence professionals, like Tom Tomorrow or half of DU, instead of the G.I. Joe wannabes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Stunned that we're here whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #1
Unbelievable. Octafish Feb 2013 #2
Yep, that about sums it all up.... WCGreen Feb 2013 #19
Professor Droney explains Constitutional Law 101. Octafish Feb 2013 #32
K&R Solly Mack Feb 2013 #3
Secret Government and its associated Kill Lists are troubling, no matter who's in the Oval Office. Octafish Feb 2013 #4
What a long way we've come Catherina Feb 2013 #5
Which brings up the central question: ''When did murder become an approved national policy?'' Octafish Feb 2013 #7
You forgot "depraved". Catherina Feb 2013 #9
Thank you. Fixed! Octafish Feb 2013 #11
Bam. (nt) DirkGently Feb 2013 #6
Some things are beneath the United States of America. Octafish Feb 2013 #8
We have become a rogue state. DirkGently Feb 2013 #12
K&R! "It's legal" does not make it moral. Legal does not trump moral. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #10
We are making enemies much faster than we can kill them. Why? Octafish Feb 2013 #13
I figure two possible reasons: a permanent war budget, or to draw destruction upon the US. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #16
Both. Suppose World War II was really just a misunderstanding between elites? Octafish Feb 2013 #20
The goal is not to win but to make the war go on indefinitely kenny blankenship Feb 2013 #23
When the commie USSR croaked, we were promised a 'Peace Dividend.' Octafish Feb 2013 #30
it is disturbing how many prevaricators there are here on this issue.... Agony Feb 2013 #14
When Bush did it, DU was sore pissed. Octafish Feb 2013 #22
Pvc Manning probably feels safer in prison with drones on the loose looking rhett o rick Feb 2013 #15
Droney sez: 'Good citizens cover-up war crimes.' Octafish Feb 2013 #24
yep, Bush used that age rationale at Falluja stupidicus Feb 2013 #17
Based on the principles established by the Caroline case and cited at Nuremberg... Octafish Feb 2013 #25
indeed stupidicus Feb 2013 #31
Hold it ! Wait! The dashboard believers were told that liberals are not saying anything about this underpants Feb 2013 #18
Those were different days. A different enemy. An existential threat. Octafish Feb 2013 #26
Thanks for this, Octafish! - nt dreamnightwind Feb 2013 #21
Stamps. Octafish Feb 2013 #27
^ Wilms Feb 2013 #28
Who cashed in on World War I and all wars through to the present day? Octafish Feb 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How a Secret Memo Justifi...»Reply #13