Propaganda.

[ConservativeDemocrat]

108. Because there is precedent, that is the correct interpretation...

..of the Constitution. Period. That's the way our laws work. It is also why Roe v. Wade is the law of the land.

Now if like anti-choice advocates, you say that the decision made is not "right", then I'll merely say that good people can disagree. However, anyone (like the OP) who brings up the Constitution as if they are the arbiter of what it means rather than the Supreme Court (which ruled the other way), then I'll start talking about emotional, fact free, argumentation.

And in terms of arrogance, screeds that use loaded terms like "Propaganda" and which make declaratory judgements on the morality of others they disagree with... well, that seems rather more arrogant to me.


So joy - I get to be called a "baby killer" by both people who think a fertilized egg is a human being and people who think killing Al Qaeda terrorists in hostile desert hideaways is Constitutional. Such a moral reprobate I am.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community