General Discussion

struggle4progress

(126,661 posts)

93. (1) I never supported W's Iraq adventure, and I thought from the start that the WMD noise

Fri Feb 8, 2013, 05:17 PM

Feb 2013

was obvious warmongering bullshizz;

(2) My own personal inclinations are strongly pacifist, but people didn't listen to me in the 60s, they didn't listen to me about Reagan's warmongering in the 80s, they didn't listen to me about Bush I's Panama or Gulf adventures, and they sure as shizz didn't listen to me about W's game of shrieking softly and acting like a big dick

(3) To win political discussions, it's necessary to talk to people in their terms, not in one's own term, and the current dominant conceptualization is that anti-terrorist action is a form of warfare -- so if you want to win the fight, go learn to talk to other people in their terms

(4) I simply asked questions, from which you believe you can assess my position -- you don't like questions? Tough ...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

99 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does Obama's green-light on assassination of Americans change your view [View all] demwing Feb 2013 OP

Not A Whisker, Sir: They Remain Sunk In Paranoid Delusion, Same As They Ever Were The Magistrate Feb 2013 #1

There it is! MADem Feb 2013 #26

Concur - thanks quaker bill Feb 2013 #49

At which the thread usefully concludes. Robb Feb 2013 #52

Well isn't that special! demwing Feb 2013 #55

My, you sound upset. Robb Feb 2013 #62

"Your conflation failed" demwing Feb 2013 #65

You're a supporter of targeted assassination of Americans, though. I think he meant to engage Romulox Feb 2013 #57

I Recognize, Sir, That Combatants Are At Hazard In War, Whatever Their Birthplace Might Be The Magistrate Feb 2013 #63

The obvious problem is the lack of required proof. demwing Feb 2013 #66

The Obvious Problem, Sir, Is the Co-Mingling Of Categories The Magistrate Feb 2013 #69

I believe you are missing the bigger picture demwing Feb 2013 #71

And It Looks To Me Like You Are Trying To Avoid The Particulars, Sir The Magistrate Feb 2013 #75

By this logic, we should give up on gun control demwing Feb 2013 #77

The Actual Particulars Of The Deaths, Sir The Magistrate Feb 2013 #82

Yes, I'm in agreement with you Rider3 Feb 2013 #76

An amateur gun nut vs. trained sniper with a mission to kill? liberal N proud Feb 2013 #2

We already did derby378 Feb 2013 #4

Hint - France isn't coming this time liberal N proud Feb 2013 #13

That, Sir, is Distorted To The Point Of Being Flatly A-Historic The Magistrate Feb 2013 #19

Lacking that gunpowder, and your few little gun nuts turn out to be ... well, just nuts. LanternWaste Feb 2013 #97

"A few gun nuts" or maybe a few more? demwing Feb 2013 #5

A few gun nutz on horse back, with pre WW1, single shot rifles, defeated Russia in Afghanistan. RC Feb 2013 #41

Flat Nonesense, Sir The Magistrate Feb 2013 #64

Yeah, you're correct. RC Feb 2013 #83

But They Were Not Even Then Holding their Own, Sir, As You Described The Magistrate Feb 2013 #87

Their Fear Is Real - Their Paranoia May Be Misplaced cantbeserious Feb 2013 #3

"Does Obama's green-light on assassination of American terrorists change your view" sagat Feb 2013 #6

Fair enough, but... demwing Feb 2013 #7

As long as they target Al Qaeda gholtron Feb 2013 #90

WTF? will my glock stop a drone I can't see? rustydog Feb 2013 #8

I'm curious - which took the bigger leap? demwing Feb 2013 #9

That second point tblue Feb 2013 #14

... Leslie Valley Feb 2013 #10

game, set, upi402 Feb 2013 #45

Kick back and have a glass of wine. It's good for the blood and blood takes oxygen to the brain. lonestarnot Feb 2013 #11

I'm consistently against both, but yes, I do see the hypocrisy. Bonobo Feb 2013 #12

Agreed on all points. /nt demwing Feb 2013 #32

No. The US is intent on Global Empire. The home folk are already owned, lock, stock and barrel. libdem4life Feb 2013 #15

Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #16

+100. nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #17

Nope, nope, and nope. MotherPetrie Feb 2013 #18

Is that you Berserker Feb 2013 #60

What does that mean? Please explain because I have no idea. MotherPetrie Feb 2013 #61

With that display Berserker Feb 2013 #67

You obviously did not comprehend my post in the slightest then MotherPetrie Feb 2013 #91

They're not really afraid of Govt, only the black guy. Never a word from them under white (R) prez. JaneyVee Feb 2013 #20

What is your theory about how to respond to non-state agencies that are, in effect, devoted struggle4progress Feb 2013 #21

Good question. But don't expect a rational answer. The holding hands, kumbaya urge bluestate10 Feb 2013 #25

I can pretty much tell that you have no clue what I believe here demwing Feb 2013 #36

"Do you think there would be no political repercussions?" demwing Feb 2013 #29

Thanks. elleng Feb 2013 #37

Your theory tama Feb 2013 #46

(1) I never supported W's Iraq adventure, and I thought from the start that the WMD noise struggle4progress Feb 2013 #93

Questions have premises tama Feb 2013 #98

Only if ACORN stole the election for Obama uponit7771 Feb 2013 #22

Is that you Alex? Tarheel_Dem Feb 2013 #23

Killing a terrorist isn't assassination. nt bluestate10 Feb 2013 #24

How about a suspected terrorist?? Angry Dragon Feb 2013 #27

Who's the terrorist demwing Feb 2013 #28

Right. elleng Feb 2013 #35

OK tama Feb 2013 #47

Nope Solly Mack Feb 2013 #30

Why? demwing Feb 2013 #33

Why would one change my mind about the other? Solly Mack Feb 2013 #43

I never mentioned gun hoarding demwing Feb 2013 #56

You said gun nuts. Solly Mack Feb 2013 #59

I put the term in quotes demwing Feb 2013 #74

Allrighty then. Solly Mack Feb 2013 #86

Nope. Nt abelenkpe Feb 2013 #31

No, and NOT assassination, which is elleng Feb 2013 #34

thank you! dlwickham Feb 2013 #39

"To murder (a prominent person) by surprise attack, as for political reasons." demwing Feb 2013 #40

There is nothing "prominent" about a dillweed I have never heard of. quaker bill Feb 2013 #50

I'm sure that all the people on our kill list will be relieved demwing Feb 2013 #51

A pimple on your nose is prominent demwing Feb 2013 #58

So, by your standards quaker bill Feb 2013 #89

Al Qaeda is a pretty loose organization fujiyama Feb 2013 #42

no dlwickham Feb 2013 #38

do liberals support a initary executive whacking citizens? upi402 Feb 2013 #44

Nope, they're just as crazy as ever. JoePhilly Feb 2013 #48

"takes up arms against the United States" demwing Feb 2013 #53

Robbing a bank, even one that is federally ensured, is not ... JoePhilly Feb 2013 #54

Nope. I'm still against killing people with guns or drones. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #68

As am I / nt demwing Feb 2013 #73

A drone, a cruise missile, a helicopter gunship, special forces. CJCRANE Feb 2013 #70

Civil rights should not be protected based on popular opinion. /nt demwing Feb 2013 #72

No gcomeau Feb 2013 #78

That depends on your view on Gun Control, doesn't it? /nt demwing Feb 2013 #79

No, actually it doesn't. -eom gcomeau Feb 2013 #80

Well, since you won't share the details of your opinion demwing Feb 2013 #81

I'll give you one hint... gcomeau Feb 2013 #84

First , you seem to assume I favor owning an assault weapon demwing Feb 2013 #85

Read the "you" as generic. gcomeau Feb 2013 #88

Got any examples of these assasinated Americans? jambo101 Feb 2013 #92

No. The government will always have superior force. -nt- DireStrike Feb 2013 #94

unrelated nt Deep13 Feb 2013 #95

How precisely would a hand gun protect me from a drone...? LanternWaste Feb 2013 #96

Not my issue demwing Feb 2013 #99