Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)What It's Going to Take to Claw Back Middle Class Wealth from the 1% [View all]
http://www.alternet.org/economy/what-its-going-take-claw-back-middle-class-wealth-1
If you truly care about economic justice, then you've got to worry about the precipitous decline of labor unions in the United States. Just take a look at these two charts. The first shows the rise and decline of union membership in the private sector from the depths of the Great Depression to today. You can clearly see that unions were a very big deal from the mid-1930s to the early 1980s. By 1953, more than one out of three American workers were members of private sector unions. That means there was a union member in nearly every family.
Through the late 1950s and 1960s, the percentage of union members declined, but the absolute number continued to increase, peaking at nearly 21 million members in 1979, (largely due to the influx of public sector workers during the 1960s and 70s). Then the decline accelerated as the share of union members fell by half between the mid-1970s and the early 1990s. (If we include public employee union members, the current rate is 11.3 percent.)

The second chart traces the share of our national income grabbed by the top one percent of U.S. households. It's basically the inverse of the unionization chart. When unions were at their strongest, inequality was the lowest. In 1928, the top one percent hauled off 23.94 percent of all U.S. income. As unions grew, the income share for the richest dropped to less than 10 percent. And as unions declined, the income share going to the wealthiest shot right back up to 1928 levels.

It's not a coincidence. When unions are strong, they bargain for higher wages and benefits. At the same time, non-union employers increase wages and benefits to attract qualified workers and prevent unions from coming in. Also, unions work for legislation that benefits middle- and low-income people (unemployment benefits, minimum wage, progressive taxation, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security etc.). Overall, those efforts shift income from the top to the middle and bottom of the income ladder. (For more information on inequality, please see my new book, How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour: Why Hedge Funds Get Away with Siphoning Off America's Wealth ).
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
True, but then again neither party really advocates for the middle class.
NorthCarolina
Feb 2013
#17
You can't squeeze blood out of turnips and the 1% has the means to protect their wealth.
bubbayugga
Feb 2013
#78
I agree with that. My point is they cannot be revived through immigration n/t
Demo_Chris
Feb 2013
#62
That's pretty much been the plan for years. The GOP wants an illegal labor force to depress wages.
freshwest
Feb 2013
#65
The real paradigm shift is accepting that we might be trying to re-fight the last war rather than
TheKentuckian
Feb 2013
#56
Agreed. Unfortunately there is widespread perception that unions protect their members
geckosfeet
Feb 2013
#7
And what is it going to take to claw back wealth the middle/upper took from the lower class?
Spryguy
Feb 2013
#8
There was a recent poll here, and 20% of DU members did NOT support unions (that replied)
Drahthaardogs
Feb 2013
#16
While that is romantic, revolutions rarely if ever turn power over to the masses.
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#59
Inheritance taxes reclaim wealth, income taxes pull back a small portion of annual earnings
1-Old-Man
Feb 2013
#22
The problem is more people care about Wall St returns than Main St's return.
raouldukelives
Feb 2013
#25
All I have seen from Wall St in my neck of the woods is the reduction of labor.
raouldukelives
Feb 2013
#34
Oh practically any union member is better off than a non union member in that field.
dkf
Feb 2013
#46
Investing is the only path to retirement. Otherwise it's whatever your SS provides for you
dkf
Feb 2013
#72
The wealth lost was the housing market. The stock market is back up to pre crash levels.
dkf
Feb 2013
#28
It is always pleasing to see a person with a low post count hit the nail right on the head.
1-Old-Man
Feb 2013
#31