General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Open mic nights at bar lead to lawsuit from BMI over music, ask for $121,000 [View all]GReedDiamond
(5,509 posts)...in previous posts, as a composer, performer and publisher of original music, what other means of protecting my financial interests in my work should I be utilizing instead of BMI or some other performing rights organization? Copyrights are but one aspect of protection, because without PROs, those copyrights would likely be useless.
BTW, while I'm more familiar with the Los Angeles music scene/clubs and other venues, I have played in San Francisco from time to time over the years.
I have very little sympathy for clubs who feel they should be able to use other people's work without licensing it. Additionally, it's not completely unheard of for these clubs to generally treat bands/performers like shit, especially those just starting out, so, again, I have a hard time feeling their pain.
Another request I made was to provide some kind of reputable source which shows that BMI and other PROs are using "shakedown" tactics on behalf of the artists they represent. So far, only anecdotal evidence of such tactics has been presented, unless I missed it somewhere. Otherwise, in reference to the article linked-to in the OP, one of the club operators was assessed a fee which amounted to $7.12 per day, in order to properly and ethically use other people's work as a draw to bring in customers. If that is unaffordable, that is a strong indication that the management is either disingenuous about the financial impact of those fees, or incompetent at running their business. Possibly both.
Anyway, no hard feelings, that's just the way it is, and we likely disagree no matter what either of us have to say, so I'll leave it at that.
ON EDIT: Thanks to whoever for the heart, if you happen to see this post, I appreciate it very much.