Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 2nd Encounter of the Day.... Over guns this time [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)72. What tangents?
I'm discussing the OP and your reaction to it.
Why do you care who I like or hang out with anyway? What possible difference does it make in your life? Why the constant evangelization. Are you so insecure in your views that you have to convert everyone? You're backed by some of the most powerful moneyed interests in the country. What ordinary people think is inconsequential. You have power and capital on your side. I would think that would be enough to suit you. You'll get to keep your guns and we'll keep dying. There is no danger of a rush to value human life in this country. Profits will always mean more than human beings. Your interests are well looked after.
So, you've evolved from shunning the guy minding his own business and not shunning criminals presumed to be armed to feeling put upon as if you're somehow entitled to keep company with (presumably) illegally armed drug dealers. And then it morphs into a tangent that an unemployed assistant project manager (me) has all this powerful financial backing. And the work-a-day people who want to keep their guns because there are armed criminals (whom you won't shun and apparently feel entitled to keep company with) are more of a threat than the armed criminals you apparently feel entitled to keep company with. Maybe the armed criminals you feel entitled to keep company with are the reason work-a-day people feel threatened enough to keep guns? Maybe if people shunned criminals and stopped trying to disarm good people the criminals might find a different career.
"We'll keep dying."
Not from guns owned by good people. It's the criminals you should be speaking out against.
This is a very peculiar mindset and none of it makes sense to me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Liability insurance doesn't cover inanimate objects. It covers the insured PERSON for screwups.
slackmaster
Feb 2013
#3
Ugh. Logic fail on a Sunday no less. The insurance isn't covering the CAR
galileoreloaded
Feb 2013
#26
Sigh. Tell you what. I'll give you a car, you insure either the car or you.
galileoreloaded
Feb 2013
#77
I oversimplified the concept of vicarious liability which I assume is what
galileoreloaded
Feb 2013
#81
All true. That's why I think it might be a successful move to build a fund to pay lawyers
BlueStreak
Feb 2013
#9
Leaving your gun on a table where your 3-year-old can blow his brains out is a CRIMINAL ACT
BlueStreak
Feb 2013
#86
Are you maintaining that you do not wish to be held responsible for any possible negligence?
Fumesucker
Feb 2013
#24
If your firearm is adequately secured you have no liability under my scenario
Fumesucker
Feb 2013
#49
I live in a very poor county in north Florida. Hunting deer and hog is very common here. ...
spin
Feb 2013
#83
He never brandished his gun. The OP says he was reaching for his wallet to pay.
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2013
#68
For dogs sake don't go out and play vigilante. And I have a grip, so to speak.
geckosfeet
Feb 2013
#67
Your courage is commendable, but I'd be cautious: most "RKBA enthusiasts" I've run across have
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#51