Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 2nd Encounter of the Day.... Over guns this time [View all]Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)74. Cars also hurt and kill people and insurance covers that
You wish for society to cover the costs to society if your guns are stolen from you and misused, I don't have a problem with that actually unless you have been negligent in properly securing those guns, the insurance would be to cover you in case you should at some point become negligent and your guns are stolen and misused to harm someone.
Of course the insurance would also cover any harm you might cause with your guns also.
My point is that there are exceedingly few genuine accidents with firearms and a great deal of negligent acts performed with them, more than a few of which cause sometimes grievous harm to others.
http://negligentdischarge.com/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Liability insurance doesn't cover inanimate objects. It covers the insured PERSON for screwups.
slackmaster
Feb 2013
#3
Ugh. Logic fail on a Sunday no less. The insurance isn't covering the CAR
galileoreloaded
Feb 2013
#26
Sigh. Tell you what. I'll give you a car, you insure either the car or you.
galileoreloaded
Feb 2013
#77
I oversimplified the concept of vicarious liability which I assume is what
galileoreloaded
Feb 2013
#81
All true. That's why I think it might be a successful move to build a fund to pay lawyers
BlueStreak
Feb 2013
#9
Leaving your gun on a table where your 3-year-old can blow his brains out is a CRIMINAL ACT
BlueStreak
Feb 2013
#86
Are you maintaining that you do not wish to be held responsible for any possible negligence?
Fumesucker
Feb 2013
#24
If your firearm is adequately secured you have no liability under my scenario
Fumesucker
Feb 2013
#49
I live in a very poor county in north Florida. Hunting deer and hog is very common here. ...
spin
Feb 2013
#83
He never brandished his gun. The OP says he was reaching for his wallet to pay.
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2013
#68
For dogs sake don't go out and play vigilante. And I have a grip, so to speak.
geckosfeet
Feb 2013
#67
Your courage is commendable, but I'd be cautious: most "RKBA enthusiasts" I've run across have
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#51