Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To those who say drones and B-52's are indistinguishable, a question. [View all]Gman
(24,780 posts)3. Seriously? They're saying there's no difference between a B52 and a drone?
Drones can carpet bomb? Has DU descended that far on this issue? Hysteria runs rampant.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A B-52 has a on-board human crew. It's longest bombing mission was 35 hours.
Agnosticsherbet
Feb 2013
#1
All true, but respectfully, I feel you are dodging the point I am trying to make. nt
Bonobo
Feb 2013
#6
Well their argument is that a drone is "preferable" because it is more "surgical"
Bonobo
Feb 2013
#5
Yes, but he could also "get away with" strikes launched by manned aircraft. (nt)
jeff47
Feb 2013
#16
I think I see your point. The difference is that sooner of later, Pakistan or somebody will shoot
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2013
#19
I seem to remember President Clinton shooting cruise missiles all over the goddamn place
alcibiades_mystery
Feb 2013
#20
I'm rather more shocked that you lived through the Clinton Admin and are so ignorant
Bonobo
Feb 2013
#27
I have no idea what your sig line was, I never reported on it and I don't care. nt
Bonobo
Feb 2013
#37