Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SpartanDem

(4,533 posts)
16. The south was settled largely by the Scots-Irish
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:26 AM
Feb 2013

who arrived relatively late so they settled in the less populated less expensive parts of the country. I read a book last year on the history fundamentalism in America called The Sword of Lord it's by Andrew Himes, the Scots-Irish played a big role development of fundamentalism in this country.

How the Scots-Irish Invented Fundamentalism


James’ second problem was a troublesome group of dirt-poor, hardscrabble farmers and fighters in the borderlands and lowlands along the Scottish, English, and Welsh borders. They led a marginal existence, were famous for their cattle-rustling and raiding, and were considered to be pugnacious, contentious, and easily inflamed. They were known as the “Border Reivers” or “Borderers” because they had played the invaluable role of a buffer between the Scottish and English warring parties during 300 years of intermittent fighting.

The Borderers were militantly Protestant, espousing an especially dogmatic and anti-Catholic version of Calvinist Presbyterianism. They believed that every word of the Bible was literally true, and that anyone who disagreed with them on any speck of Biblical doctrine was headed straight for Hell, including the Irish Catholics with whom they had been at war for centuries, and the denizens of the Church of England whom they despised for slavish service to the British state and monarch. They were people of strong convictions, easily angered, and valued for their fighting prowess. They cherished their individual freedoms: their freedom from taxes, freedom from the interference of the state in their lives, freedom to practice their religion just as they pleased. They were a ferocious people of an egalitarian spirit, and did not easily accept the yoke of any king, governor, or politician.
hey didn’t get along with the native Irish, either. The next century was replete with complicated conflicts that would sputter for a time and then flare up into armed dispute with their Catholic neighbors to the south or rebellion against a British monarch who failed to appreciate their political demands or their Calvinist theology. Life continued to be marginal, brutish, and oppressive, and their sojourn in Ulster was not a happy one. They struggled with famine, wars, and religious persecution. The first large scale immigration of Scots-Irish to America was a group that arrived in Boston from County Londonderry in 1718, and then moved to New Hampshire, where they founded the town of Londonderry.

They were followed by hundreds of thousands of other Scots-Irish over the next several decades. Many of them first settled in Pennsylvania, and then, finding all the eastern lands in the colonies either occupied or too expensive, they traveled south into Virginia and the Carolinas, and to the interior frontier lands, to the foothills of Appalachia—an area geographically very similar to their original homes in the borderlands between England and Scotland. By the beginning of the Revolutionary War, the Scots-Irish probably constituted about a quarter of the colonial American population, and on at least one occasion King George III referred to the war in North America as ‘that Presbyterian revolt.” Over the next several decades the Scots-Irish spread farther west and to the lowlands of the deeper South , and by the mid-19th century, they provided the dominant culture of the American South.

http://andrewhimes.net/content/how-scots-irish-invented-fundamentalism


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks for posting.. bookmarking OKNancy Feb 2013 #1
How is it that the ethnicity of those residing in states other than the south Skidmore Feb 2013 #2
from the article.... is how respondents identified themselves justabob Feb 2013 #3
The answer is in the article. That's how they self identify,unlike the rest of the country. hedda_foil Feb 2013 #4
I find that soooooo interesting.... FredStembottom Feb 2013 #6
Also, the question was "ancestry or ethnic origin" muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #17
Am I reading this wrong? Mostly English in Utah? So they're Mormons? freshwest Feb 2013 #5
Given that LDS was founded in 1830 SpartanDem Feb 2013 #9
Stumps me. Should have had a large population of natives already there. freshwest Feb 2013 #10
They started in Western NY and moved west from there. SpartanDem Feb 2013 #12
Yeh, guess the immigrant population was heavily English. Mine came over 200 years before then. freshwest Feb 2013 #14
What states were those election rigging laws proposed, again? SpartanDem Feb 2013 #7
There was a very significant German population before the Revolution in Pennsylvania. NutmegYankee Feb 2013 #8
If they were the old stock British-Americans LiberalFighter Feb 2013 #11
I've wondered that. My earliest forbear was from Scotland and he came in 1790. CTyankee Feb 2013 #13
The south was settled largely by the Scots-Irish SpartanDem Feb 2013 #16
Having relocated to the south many years ago, the non-ethnicity vibe was most apparrent to me Populist_Prole Feb 2013 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Salon: Southern White Pro...»Reply #16