General Discussion

Major Nikon

(36,925 posts)

48. The author you parroted damn sure did have something to say about Social Security being a scam

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 07:20 PM

Jan 2012

Perhaps you should know your sources a bit better.

And no, just because I don't agree with your sources, doesn't make their ideas right wing, but when most every other economist that's worth the powder it would take to blow them to hell disagrees with them on this issue and you ONLY see these looney ideas posted by the farthest of the far right wing loons, that does make a pretty damn good case for it. In fact, I'm not sure how else you would make a case for it.

From now on every time I see you posting tripe from far right wing hacks on this subject, I'm going to call it out as just that. Don't like it? Tough shit. I don't care how many times you want to sequel "ad hominem". I don't come to a left based web site to debate the merits of looney wingnut ideas.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

51 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Right-Wing Libertarians, John Birchers and Conspiracy Freaks Are Trying to Hijack OWS [View all] Galraedia Jan 2012 OP

1/13/12 The Occupy Movement is not associated with Ron Paul, or his supporters, Zorra Jan 2012 #1

Wonderful post. Rex Jan 2012 #31

They sound a bit like the SWP in the UK Ebadlun Jan 2012 #51

The Federal Reserve is run by and for the big banks. AdHocSolver Jan 2012 #2

Central banking serves numerous purposes both public and private. Major Nikon Jan 2012 #6

The Fed doesn't work for the people of the US. It works for the banks and Wall Street. nt AdHocSolver Jan 2012 #7

It does work for you Major Nikon Jan 2012 #8

Spare me your nonsense! AdHocSolver Jan 2012 #12

You lost me with your subject line Major Nikon Jan 2012 #13

Translation: you believe what you believe regardless of facts. TheWraith Jan 2012 #14

+10000000000 , so many suffer suffer from normalcy bias and cognitive dissonance stockholmer Jan 2012 #17

btw, I do have to say you subject line is a little harsh, tis easier to catch flies with honey than stockholmer Jan 2012 #19

I was responding to the poster's "sweetly" condescending tone of voice. AdHocSolver Jan 2012 #26

You know so little for someone with a degree banned from Kos Jan 2012 #28

Logic and facts are wasted on those with a closed mind Major Nikon Jan 2012 #34

LOLOL!!!--> "not to monkey with the yield curve" ahhh Operation Twist? go study up, as in Econ 101 stockholmer Jan 2012 #40

Ya gotta love it when someone says, "you really need to read up..." Major Nikon Jan 2012 #42

typical, so typical, you didn't address one thing of subtance, the bottom line is the poster stockholmer Jan 2012 #44

So why can't you find any liberal or even moderate sources to back up your claims? Major Nikon Jan 2012 #47

Dr Steve Keen, Dr Michael Hudson, Dr Hyman Minsky, Dr Donald Markwell, Dr Paul Ormerod etc stockholmer Jan 2012 #49

You also claimed Ron Paul doesn't advocate a return to a gold standard, except that he does Major Nikon Jan 2012 #50

Paul (I do not support him, btw) does not advocate a return to gold standard, he stockholmer Jan 2012 #18

And the "competing currency" is based on gold Major Nikon Jan 2012 #27

Perhaps a return to the basic functions of the Fed may help you banned from Kos Jan 2012 #30

Nationalize the Fed, rip it away from the private money changers who own it and you, here they are: stockholmer Jan 2012 #39

You're parroting a free market loon who claims Social Security is "One of the Great Scams!" Major Nikon Jan 2012 #43

again, you offer NOTHING of substance, nothing of factual rebuttal, just more tired false ad hominem stockholmer Jan 2012 #45

The author you parroted damn sure did have something to say about Social Security being a scam Major Nikon Jan 2012 #48

btw, in this post (on this very same thread) I attack Paul hard from THE LEFT stockholmer Jan 2012 #46

You don't have to be a Libertarian to understand the evil behind this Zalatix Jan 2012 #41

It's fine for people on the right to join, no? David__77 Jan 2012 #3

This was clear to a lot of us from the very beginning. The Ron Paul signs were a dead giveaway. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #4

Oh noes! The Occupy movement sullied by Paul! Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #5

Since OWS has no agenda and no leadership... randome Jan 2012 #9

Except the message. Galraedia Jan 2012 #10

True, not to mention the OWS message boards and other social media outlets. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #38

I've always thought that a lot of the conspiracy stuff is CIA dirty tricks Enrique Jan 2012 #11

I often wonder if government or corporate dirty-tricks groups send the conspiracy nuts. backscatter712 Jan 2012 #15

nice conflation of anyone who questions the official 9-11 tale with UFO wackos, sheesh stockholmer Jan 2012 #21

That's a brilliant video. n/t Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #36

"it is so sophisticated and so logically coherent and so carefully crafted and maintained" stockholmer Jan 2012 #22

"sham 2 party system" - spoken like a true ZeroHead enthusiast where Ron Paul is supreme banned from Kos Jan 2012 #33

welcome back old friend! haven't seen you since DU2 days, was concerned you got lost stockholmer Jan 2012 #37

So wait...you think the consiracy stuff is itself a conspiracy? Snake Alchemist Jan 2012 #35

I love the OWS forum moderator's comment: muriel_volestrangler Jan 2012 #16

Oh, yeah, that's brilliant. randome Jan 2012 #20

Don't underestimate noise. joshcryer Jan 2012 #24

Or they tune out. randome Jan 2012 #29

As well they shouldn't. joshcryer Jan 2012 #25

What I've found fascinating, to be sure, is that while they try to pretend to align with OWS... joshcryer Jan 2012 #23

No, no, this week's meme is "gypsies" and "thieves" ... T S Justly Jan 2012 #32