Why The Gun Lobby Is Terrified Of California - from Mother Jones - *5-cent tax on each bullet*

[farminator3000]

153. i'll talk about 'em! (perhaps the 'gun enthusiasts' are shocked into speechlessness?)

that detachable mag thing is going to freak gun peeps out, i think i get why.

am i right, shouldn't it say 'detachable mags larger than the standard capacity'? and then set the capacity at like 8 or 10?

because ALL pistols that aren't revolvers have those mags?

or are they trying to all ban semi-auto pistols. the wording is kinda confusing there?

never mind, i answered my own question- (can somebody tweet the author @ mother jones and tell him to fix that? RIFLES not firearms? right?)

cuz, this is the link from the article right above where it says 'firearms':

http://sd06.senate.ca.gov/news/2013-02-07-proposals-curb-gun-violence
Senate Democrats’ Ten Legislative Actions

REGULATION: Closing loopholes in existing laws

Fixed magazines (Steinberg): Prohibit the future sale, purchase, manufacture, importation, or transfer in California of semi-automatic rifles that can accept detachable magazines. This legislative action decisively closes the loopholes that have allowed the gun industry to flood our communities with rapid-reload battlefield weapons.

***

the BG check for bullets, why not, if you aren't doing anything wrong. it takes 90 seconds, and it'll stop(or slow down) people from selling bullets on the black market.

i bet google knows when you buy gas @ the gas station, no big deal.