Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "DOJ kill list memo forces many Dems out of the closet as overtly unprincipled hacks" [View all]Catherina
(35,568 posts)67. That's part of what's prompting the frantic defense. ACLU on Obama's 1st U.N. treaty body review
U.S. Violating Human Rights of Children, Says U.N. Committee
By Allison Frankel, ACLU Human Rights Program at 11:41am
The Obama Administration recently underwent its first U.N. treaty body review, and the resulting concluding observations made public yesterday should be a cause for alarm. The observations, issued by independent U.N. experts tasked with monitoring compliance with the international treaty on the rights of children in armed conflict (formally known as the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict or "OPAC"
, paint a dark picture of the treatment of juveniles by the U.S. military in Afghanistan: one where hundreds of children have been killed in attacks and air strikes by U.S. military forces, and those responsible for the killings have not been held to account even as the number of children killed doubled from 2010 to 2011; where children under 18 languish in detention facilities without access to legal or full humanitarian assistance, or adequate resources to aid in their recovery and reintegration as required under international law. Some children were abused in U.S. detention facilities, and others are faced with the prospect of torture and ill-treatment if they are transferred to Afghan custody.
By ratifying OPAC in 2002, the U.S. committed to guaranteeing basic protections to children in armed conflict zones, and to submit periodic reports on the implementation of its treaty obligations to the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child. We wrote about the latest U.S. report, released in November, which revealed that over 200 children have been held in U.S. custody in Afghanistan since 2008, some for lengthy periods of time. During its review of the U.S. on January 16, the Committee posed critical questions about the treatment of children by the U.S. military and issued recommendations to remedy these human rights violations.
These recommendations include taking "concrete and firm precautionary measures to prevent indiscriminate use of force" particularly against children, and ensuring all allegations of unlawful use of force are "investigated in a transparent, timely and independent manner" and that "children and families victims of attacks and air strikes do always receive redress and compensation." In regard to the detention of juveniles, the Committee urged the U.S. to ensure that all children under 18 are detained separately from adults and guaranteed access to free and independent legal assistance as well as an independent complaints mechanism. Importantly, considering the previous U.S. response to the Committee revealed that the average age of children detained by U.S. forces is only 16 years old and the average length of stay for juveniles in U.S. military custody has been approximately one year, the Committee recommended children be detained only "as measures of last resort and for the shortest possible period of time and that in all cases alternatives to detention are given priority."
The Committee also stressed that allegations of torture and other forms of mistreatment must be investigated and the perpetrators brought to justice, and that no child should be transferred to Afghan custody if "there are substantial grounds for the danger of being subject to torture and ill treatment." The Committee specifically mentioned the case of Omar Kadr, a former child soldier who was detained by U.S. forces at the age of 15 and was subjected to torture and a systematic program of harsh and highly coercive interrogations at the American prisons at Guantánamo Bay and Bagram.
...
http://www.aclu.org/blog/human-rights/us-violating-human-rights-children-says-un-committee
By Allison Frankel, ACLU Human Rights Program at 11:41am
The Obama Administration recently underwent its first U.N. treaty body review, and the resulting concluding observations made public yesterday should be a cause for alarm. The observations, issued by independent U.N. experts tasked with monitoring compliance with the international treaty on the rights of children in armed conflict (formally known as the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict or "OPAC"
By ratifying OPAC in 2002, the U.S. committed to guaranteeing basic protections to children in armed conflict zones, and to submit periodic reports on the implementation of its treaty obligations to the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child. We wrote about the latest U.S. report, released in November, which revealed that over 200 children have been held in U.S. custody in Afghanistan since 2008, some for lengthy periods of time. During its review of the U.S. on January 16, the Committee posed critical questions about the treatment of children by the U.S. military and issued recommendations to remedy these human rights violations.
These recommendations include taking "concrete and firm precautionary measures to prevent indiscriminate use of force" particularly against children, and ensuring all allegations of unlawful use of force are "investigated in a transparent, timely and independent manner" and that "children and families victims of attacks and air strikes do always receive redress and compensation." In regard to the detention of juveniles, the Committee urged the U.S. to ensure that all children under 18 are detained separately from adults and guaranteed access to free and independent legal assistance as well as an independent complaints mechanism. Importantly, considering the previous U.S. response to the Committee revealed that the average age of children detained by U.S. forces is only 16 years old and the average length of stay for juveniles in U.S. military custody has been approximately one year, the Committee recommended children be detained only "as measures of last resort and for the shortest possible period of time and that in all cases alternatives to detention are given priority."
The Committee also stressed that allegations of torture and other forms of mistreatment must be investigated and the perpetrators brought to justice, and that no child should be transferred to Afghan custody if "there are substantial grounds for the danger of being subject to torture and ill treatment." The Committee specifically mentioned the case of Omar Kadr, a former child soldier who was detained by U.S. forces at the age of 15 and was subjected to torture and a systematic program of harsh and highly coercive interrogations at the American prisons at Guantánamo Bay and Bagram.
...
http://www.aclu.org/blog/human-rights/us-violating-human-rights-children-says-un-committee
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"DOJ kill list memo forces many Dems out of the closet as overtly unprincipled hacks" [View all]
Catherina
Feb 2013
OP
I stand with Obama, and John Bolton and Michelle Malkin and Peter King--oh, wait a minute.
Comrade Grumpy
Feb 2013
#2
But you support Hagel for Defense, and HE supported the illegal Iraq war. Hypocritical? Yes.
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#48
I can not stand those who voted for that war. You get bent about one but the other, the actual
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#59
Yep. "Smoke 'em out", "Bring it on" redux. But, of course, "Not as bad".
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2013
#4
I'm can see that several people on my ignore list have already made an appearance
Catherina
Feb 2013
#21
Polls in the weeks leading up to the war showed that 50% of Democrats supported the war.
Luminous Animal
Feb 2013
#44
Or, if you'd supported the Iraq war, you could be about to become Sec of Defense.
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#50
Greenwald looks nothing like Bush, although they were on the same page on Iraq.
Ikonoklast
Feb 2013
#16
Which Chuck Hagel supported and is about to be rewarded for that action by Obama.
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#57
Greenfield, yawn. He makes money for his alt-media-anti-views. Good money
graham4anything
Feb 2013
#35
Let's not talk about principles until Greenwald et al pony up HOW MANY DEAD PEOPLE are too many
patrice
Feb 2013
#40
FOUR fingers are FOUR fingers just as much in Rio de Janeiro as they are in Kansas, Glen. nt
patrice
Feb 2013
#41
Glen Greenwald is a "citizen of the archipelagos" who makes a living out of propaganda. nt
patrice
Feb 2013
#43
Not all dems are really dems, I'm talking about picking anyone out on the street
Puzzledtraveller
Feb 2013
#47
That's part of what's prompting the frantic defense. ACLU on Obama's 1st U.N. treaty body review
Catherina
Feb 2013
#67
Just as many "progressives" will "trust the president" (but never Bush) to destroy Social Security
Faryn Balyncd
Feb 2013
#63