General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here's video of police shouting "burn that motherfucker" and "burn him out" as Dorner was trapped. [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)That one need not decide, in a conflict, that one side is completely right and one side is completely wrong?
Dorner was a dangerous fugitive and there was probable cause to arrest him. Having taken captives and fires at police, the use of deadly force was warranted under relevant precedents.
That does not make it okay for the police to cheerlead or to fail to give him an opportunity to surrender. By the same token, it would not be advisable for them to give him an opportunity to escape absent surrender.
As a liberal, I don't simply look a news events, decide who is 100% right and good and who is 100% wrong and evil. Unfortunately, reality is not a morality play, and humans are imperfect.
Your assumption, that because I believe I the rule of law - including the relevant law in relation to the use of deadly force in the course of attempting to apprehend or obtain surrender of dangerous suspects - that I somehow condone behavior amounting to bloodlust, is a product of your own unfortunate and illiberal tendency toward a false dichotomy.
It is possible for both sides of a conflict to be wrong. But the simpleminded tend to believe that every conflict is one of right and wrong.