Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
22. money in, money out
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 01:32 PM
Feb 2013

If they put money into science and technology they are going to want results, profit. That means they are going to be pushing as many kids to go into these fields as possible even if they are not good at them. These colleges and businesses they are going to be partnering with are going to want large numbers of kids coming to them so they can make a profit. If they don't see the number of kids majoring in math and science they want they will push kids into it. It already happens with advanced classes and more and more with regular classes. Schools want to look good so they can get federal money. The way they look good is by giving the statistics the government is looking for. One way schools do this is by pushing kids into advanced classes who aren't ready for them. Another way is by pushing special education students like mine into regular classes before they are ready. I am a parent of a senior in high school who has taken advanced classes and a parent of a special needs child in middle school. I know these pressures. I live them everyday. I see your point and it would be a valid point if federal money were not tied to school performance. Hell, even standardized tests are not bad in and of themselves. They do provide good data to see where kids need help. The problem becomes that schools are under tremendous pressure to make these kids improve or lose funding. I'm not against apprenticeships, but tying federal funding directly to how many kids major in math and science is a disaster waiting to happen.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think WE know what's wrong.... Pholus Feb 2013 #1
And the move is indeed to make profit off of public education, MadHound Feb 2013 #2
Yup this. Corporate profits have invaded every aspect of public discourse. Initech Feb 2013 #17
Yes. LWolf Feb 2013 #3
kick n/t MadHound Feb 2013 #4
The distinction between fact regurgitation and education has been blurred. raouldukelives Feb 2013 #5
Recommend... KoKo Feb 2013 #6
You know, I don't think ProSense Feb 2013 #7
This is what I am referring to, MadHound Feb 2013 #9
That is ProSense Feb 2013 #11
No, that was not referring to apprenticeships, MadHound Feb 2013 #15
High schools ProSense Feb 2013 #19
So you want to revert our education policy to the eighteenth century when apprenticeships flourished MadHound Feb 2013 #21
money in, money out liberal_at_heart Feb 2013 #22
and unfortunately, corporate involvement in public schools is usually far more short-sighted yurbud Feb 2013 #27
Considering how its worked so far.... daleanime Feb 2013 #10
Well, ProSense Feb 2013 #14
So if you have money you can have a voice in this nation..... daleanime Feb 2013 #23
What the hell are you talking about? ProSense Feb 2013 #24
? n/t MadHound Feb 2013 #25
K&R midnight Feb 2013 #8
Applying a corporate model to the public education system, octoberlib Feb 2013 #12
Tea Party loons starting to affect bond issues Floyd_Gondolli Feb 2013 #13
parents will drive the change liberal_at_heart Feb 2013 #16
Exactly. He is calling for more of the same, expanding to high schools. Testing, more testing. madfloridian Feb 2013 #18
the "solution" doesn't have to be effective as long as the right palms are greased yurbud Feb 2013 #20
kick liberal_at_heart Feb 2013 #26
This may actually help Unionism. People taking trade courses could lead to union resurgence. JaneyVee Feb 2013 #28
the people funding this Race to the Top will not allow that to happen liberal_at_heart Feb 2013 #30
not when corporations run the trade schools, it won't. the us used to have a wonderful network HiPointDem Feb 2013 #32
How do you create workers who can think outside the box after 12 years of nothing but filling it in? yurbud Feb 2013 #29
kr. obama's discussion of rttt in sotu was laughable pr-talk. HiPointDem Feb 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»And the ongoing assault o...»Reply #22