Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
1. I'm sorry, is this really an empirical view?
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 09:55 AM
Jan 2012
From the outside looking it, it looks rather like the constitutionally constrained monarchy gets to stay more or less aloof from the mosh pit of day to day politics and has at least the potential to act as a sort of moral beacon. Separated from the day to day power struggles, a monarch can simply stand for what they believe is right, and inspire others to follow an example that is more ethical than necessarily pragmatic.


Are you really looking in, or are you devising an ideal unrelated to reality? When do you see this potential, if that even exists, put to any use in Britain? Are we talking about the same family?

.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm sorry, is this really an empirical view? JackRiddler Jan 2012 #1
Pro's and Con's MichaelMcGuire Jan 2012 #2
The United States Senate is maybe less democratic than the House of Lords Glorfindel Jan 2012 #6
House of Lords MichaelMcGuire Jan 2012 #8
MSM vs D-Notice, Wall Street vs City of London, veto power by Prince Charles? jakeXT Jan 2012 #3
Hmmm, why Prince Charles, Elizabeth is the ruling Monarch. jwirr Jan 2012 #13
I think it's a good idea to separate the functions of chief of state and head of government Glorfindel Jan 2012 #4
Only A Symbol TheMastersNemesis Jan 2012 #5
Addendum To My Reply TheMastersNemesis Jan 2012 #7
The difference is... primavera Jan 2012 #14
Correct TheMastersNemesis Jan 2012 #16
Alexander Hamilton had similar ideas. jody Jan 2012 #9
Fook that Shyte waddirum Jan 2012 #10
Fairly neutral, I'd say muriel_volestrangler Jan 2012 #11
Thanks, muriel! primavera Jan 2012 #15
No-one suggests it's unpatriotic to criticise the prime minister. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #12
Good point primavera Jan 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is a monarchy good for de...»Reply #1