Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MichaelMcGuire

(1,684 posts)
2. Pro's and Con's
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 09:58 AM
Jan 2012

Personally I think republics are head of the curve
The UK needs major reform
House of Lords being one
Can't be right that someone can effect policy having not been voted in by the public

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm sorry, is this really an empirical view? JackRiddler Jan 2012 #1
Pro's and Con's MichaelMcGuire Jan 2012 #2
The United States Senate is maybe less democratic than the House of Lords Glorfindel Jan 2012 #6
House of Lords MichaelMcGuire Jan 2012 #8
MSM vs D-Notice, Wall Street vs City of London, veto power by Prince Charles? jakeXT Jan 2012 #3
Hmmm, why Prince Charles, Elizabeth is the ruling Monarch. jwirr Jan 2012 #13
I think it's a good idea to separate the functions of chief of state and head of government Glorfindel Jan 2012 #4
Only A Symbol TheMastersNemesis Jan 2012 #5
Addendum To My Reply TheMastersNemesis Jan 2012 #7
The difference is... primavera Jan 2012 #14
Correct TheMastersNemesis Jan 2012 #16
Alexander Hamilton had similar ideas. jody Jan 2012 #9
Fook that Shyte waddirum Jan 2012 #10
Fairly neutral, I'd say muriel_volestrangler Jan 2012 #11
Thanks, muriel! primavera Jan 2012 #15
No-one suggests it's unpatriotic to criticise the prime minister. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #12
Good point primavera Jan 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is a monarchy good for de...»Reply #2