Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MichaelMcGuire

(1,684 posts)
8. House of Lords
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 10:13 AM
Jan 2012

The process of having a second chamber has its points
But many of these ex-MPs now lords having lost their seat
effecting policy.


Think of a retirement home for politicians you thought you got rid off

Here Lord Wallace of tankerness



Interfering and losing badly

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm sorry, is this really an empirical view? JackRiddler Jan 2012 #1
Pro's and Con's MichaelMcGuire Jan 2012 #2
The United States Senate is maybe less democratic than the House of Lords Glorfindel Jan 2012 #6
House of Lords MichaelMcGuire Jan 2012 #8
MSM vs D-Notice, Wall Street vs City of London, veto power by Prince Charles? jakeXT Jan 2012 #3
Hmmm, why Prince Charles, Elizabeth is the ruling Monarch. jwirr Jan 2012 #13
I think it's a good idea to separate the functions of chief of state and head of government Glorfindel Jan 2012 #4
Only A Symbol TheMastersNemesis Jan 2012 #5
Addendum To My Reply TheMastersNemesis Jan 2012 #7
The difference is... primavera Jan 2012 #14
Correct TheMastersNemesis Jan 2012 #16
Alexander Hamilton had similar ideas. jody Jan 2012 #9
Fook that Shyte waddirum Jan 2012 #10
Fairly neutral, I'd say muriel_volestrangler Jan 2012 #11
Thanks, muriel! primavera Jan 2012 #15
No-one suggests it's unpatriotic to criticise the prime minister. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #12
Good point primavera Jan 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is a monarchy good for de...»Reply #8