Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 07:34 PM Feb 2013

Do we really need an Assault Weapon Ban? [View all]

I think Representative Carolyn McCarthy-NY(D) makes a good point here.

“If you take away the large magazines it’s not going to make any difference what kind of a gun you have because you’ll have less bullets into it,” she said. An assault-weapons ban “is more symbolic.”


McCarthy Backs Piecemeal Gun-Control Strategy in Congress

A ban on high-capacity gun magazines has a good chance of passing the Republican-led U.S. House if it’s offered as a stand-alone bill, said Representative Carolyn McCarthy, a New York Democrat.

With opposition in Congress to an assault-weapons ban, advancing a broad package of firearms restrictions could imperil President Barack Obama’s initiative to curb gun violence, McCarthy said today at a Bloomberg Government breakfast. She said a ban on the high-capacity devices that feed bullets and expanded background checks have support among lawmakers and could be approved.

Democrats initially had wanted to advance one major legislative package, including a ban on assault weapons, in the aftermath of the Dec. 14 shootings that killed 20 children and six adults in Newtown, Connecticut. Now, McCarthy says she’s “come around to thinking” a piecemeal approach is best.

“I was one that wanted a comprehensive package,” said McCarthy, whose husband was killed in a 1993 shooting on a Long Island Rail Road train. “I’m not going to derail everything.”

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-02-14/mccarthy-backs-piecemeal-gun-control-strategy-in-congress
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
She is right. The AWB is all about cosmetics. immoderate Feb 2013 #1
Yes frazzled Feb 2013 #2
Agreed nt newfie11 Feb 2013 #3
Finally! The LAPD is getting some good press. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2013 #24
If that's where we end up putting all our eggs then it's our fault Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #4
Better some smaller victories than one massive defeat. nt hack89 Feb 2013 #5
Yes pscot Feb 2013 #6
Do we really need high capacity assault weapons? Ruby the Liberal Feb 2013 #7
That's the point SecularMotion Feb 2013 #9
Here's how I see it going down... cherokeeprogressive Feb 2013 #16
Zombie apocalypse... one_voice Feb 2013 #20
There is that. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2013 #23
Piecemeal is fine, and something is better than nothing bhikkhu Feb 2013 #8
Makes sense madville Feb 2013 #10
She's right. Magazine capacity and detachability are logical things petronius Feb 2013 #11
Back then, 'assault weapon' did mean something...those in the jmg257 Feb 2013 #15
So it was marketing jargon intended to convey 'cool, badass, military-looking', petronius Feb 2013 #18
Better do something soon or drop it altogether NightWatcher Feb 2013 #12
No. krispos42 Feb 2013 #13
It's one or the other SecularMotion Feb 2013 #14
Exactly the problem krispos42 Feb 2013 #19
yes. new...town. spanone Feb 2013 #17
She's delusional Dr_Scholl Feb 2013 #21
Yes. Zoeisright Feb 2013 #22
No ban will make a difference until we address mental health - lynne Feb 2013 #25
Mental health issues are not present in all cases of gun violence but guns are.... bowens43 Feb 2013 #26
Mandatory bolt-action for all guns, that will fix it. bemildred Feb 2013 #27
Yes, and .50-caliber sniper rifles as well NNN0LHI Feb 2013 #28
Yes we do Progressive dog Feb 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do we really need an Assa...