Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)

4. I read the article. It seems like a balanced report of the two sides of this argument.

Reply to n2doc (Reply #2)

Thu Feb 14, 2013, 08:09 PM

Feb 2013

I get the sense from it overall that Broder didn't mind that the Tesla "failed" his test. If for not other reason, it made for an interesting read. Face it, "I got from point A to point B without any problem" isn't terribly exciting to read (or write either, I would guess.)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tesla Motors debunks a New York Times smearjob review of the Tesla S. [View all] backscatter712 Feb 2013 OP

I'm sort of .. impressed? .. that people think they can get away with faking that sort of thing Posteritatis Feb 2013 #1

Another take on it n2doc Feb 2013 #2

I read the article. It seems like a balanced report of the two sides of this argument. LiberalAndProud Feb 2013 #4

Another reason why our 'red footed friends' don't want cars to have 'black boxes'...... wandy Feb 2013 #3

I trust Musk as far as I could throw him. TeamPooka Feb 2013 #5

Musk did provide the car's log data to back up his claims. backscatter712 Feb 2013 #6

even a broken clock is right twice a day. But it's still a broken clock. nt TeamPooka Feb 2013 #7

You're welcome to your opinion... backscatter712 Feb 2013 #8

me and the federal agencies investigating Tesla.... TeamPooka Feb 2013 #9