What "due process" does not mean:

[Light House]

88. You're correct that standard tear gas was used at Waco,

so what? Koresh still lit the place up, killing everyone there.
Standard tear gas was tried on Dorner also and he still refused to surrender, so the next logical step would be to go to the next level and use the burners.
The only one who made their intentions quite clear was Dorner as evidenced by his manifesto and his murderous actions, he had vowed not to be taken alive which creates a very dangerous situation for police, they know that he won't hesitate to shoot and kill them and that he has no qualms about dying.
That type of fugitive is probably the most dangerous when cornered and out of options.

And you are completely wrong about it not being up to the subject to deny themselves due process, they have to want due process to receive it and clearly Dorner was not interested in availing himself to his right to due process.

At this point in time, continuing this debate is pointless as we seem to be talking past each other, you have your opinions, I have mine, however, I have real life experience and you seem to have emotions, and like I said, this isn't an insult, it's just my opinion.

But we can still have our differences without the rancor or insults, right?