Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "If You Don't Want to be Reminded of an Unpleasant Reality, Don't Ask to be Reminded" [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)123. Anyone
IF you do not want to be reminded that a Republican could win the White House if Obama does not have enough support, then do NOT say you refuse to support him or otherwise try to undermine enthusiasm or support for him here.
If you cannot restrain yourself, then when you are reminded of the above reality and whine that you're 'being told to shut up' or 'how to vote', or that you're 'being repressed by authority', please try to remember where you are. Because until undermining support for Obama is no longer tolerated on Democratic Underground, such complaints are just childish. Not that I have any expectation that everyone will actually take a step back and think about this. In fact, it is my experience that people love a good excuse to put on some righteous indignation and outrage.
But I have hope that, despite my 'tone', the vast majority of Duers are adults and will understand the substance of what I have said.
If you cannot restrain yourself, then when you are reminded of the above reality and whine that you're 'being told to shut up' or 'how to vote', or that you're 'being repressed by authority', please try to remember where you are. Because until undermining support for Obama is no longer tolerated on Democratic Underground, such complaints are just childish. Not that I have any expectation that everyone will actually take a step back and think about this. In fact, it is my experience that people love a good excuse to put on some righteous indignation and outrage.
But I have hope that, despite my 'tone', the vast majority of Duers are adults and will understand the substance of what I have said.
...should be able to see that the persistent negativity toward the President and dismissal of everything he does is designed to do just that.
You can find many quotes declaring the President a failure and calling for a primary challenge dated before September 2009.
There are people who hate this President and vowed never to give him a chance. Everything that comes with governing is his fault, he's a dictator or an appeaser when necessary. His actions are both a power grab and weak. It has been constant, and designed to create the impression that President Obama is severely flawed, and that someone else could do a much better job.
One of the funniest things repeated a few times recently was in response to Ron Paul's kookiness. There were actually arguments that at least he's against the MIC, but that he would never get his other policies through.
History will show Obama to be one of the most effective President's ever. There isn't a President in the top ranks who hasn't been subjected to the same criticisms that he has, especially in matters of war. He inherited a mess, a deliberately entangled war on terror, entrenched in law and the government. It was never going to be easy to untangle the mess.
The notion that all will be well again if someone else were handed the reins is pure fantasy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
215 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"If You Don't Want to be Reminded of an Unpleasant Reality, Don't Ask to be Reminded" [View all]
The Doctor.
Dec 2011
OP
To block Bush legislation is not 'sinking to Republican levels' it is standing up against
sabrina 1
Dec 2011
#194
The 'fact' is after Obama took office dems had a filibuster-proof majority in Senate only SHORT time
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#149
Wrong - much major legislation in the last several decades sidestepped the filibuster
eomer
Dec 2011
#172
Tax the wealthy, make the tax cut on the middle class permanent, and create a public option.
eomer
Dec 2011
#197
But a bill can only get into 'reconciliation' after the bill's been on the senate floor
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#200
Here's a link to the new list of the emoticons, in case you don't have it already
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#211
Or we can have both, where we have the PATRIOT Act and nuts are free to own guns
Doctor_J
Dec 2011
#133
Maybe there is a reason that so many Democratic websites are critical of Obama.
JDPriestly
Dec 2011
#99
Well, this is pretty much the most vicious "Democratic" website I've seen when it comes to BHO.
MADem
Dec 2011
#138
I was trying to find it via Google, but no official reports, so I thought maybe you might know.
gateley
Dec 2011
#37
And yet another person can't be bothered to READ the post they're responding to.
The Doctor.
Dec 2011
#64
So if you were faced with the choice of voting for one of two Fascists, which would you
JDPriestly
Dec 2011
#102
For the record, I won't be voting 'for' Obama, I'll be voting 'against' that evil
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2011
#10
Yet you have no real proof of that beyond the fact that he had to get past Republican obstruction.
The Doctor.
Dec 2011
#58
Yep, he preemptively caved his way right on by that Republican "obstruction."
a simple pattern
Dec 2011
#62
A quick glance turned up the usual "whine", "outrage" and "righteous indignation" talking points.
Bonobo
Dec 2011
#32
Well, I'm fairly confident that most Either/Or scenarios we're presented with...
LanternWaste
Dec 2011
#50
I don't think it's my confidence that's misplaced-- merely the prognostications of the few.
LanternWaste
Dec 2011
#74
Did a search - couldn't find anyone asking you to tell them how to vote.
kenny blankenship
Dec 2011
#54
K&R. It's entertaining to watch The Doctor. surgically dismiss non sequiturs.
great white snark
Dec 2011
#71
Unfair! Unfair!! Yer being logical! That's oppressive to non-logic. Isn't that a TOS violation?
TygrBright
Dec 2011
#73
I still have the quaint notion that my vote belongs to me. Not the party or any politician.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2011
#75
You have chosen to ignore that some of the most ardent bashing of Dems has come from
Doctor_J
Dec 2011
#120
if a Republican becomes president THEN people will regain perspective!!
StarsInHerHair
Dec 2011
#145
It is not authoritarian to tell people what your own choices are and expect them to
patrice
Dec 2011
#139
Especially when they don't know the diiference between "ambivalent" and "ambiguous"!
Zhade
Dec 2011
#210
I am a Democrat who believes we can wear our big boy pants and handle a little criticism.
Dustlawyer
Dec 2011
#179