Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

DetlefK

(16,670 posts)
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 08:32 AM Feb 2013

Elizabeth Warren is wrong: Jail is the wrong approach. [View all]

After all, a bank consists of many people. How do you make sure that you get throw the bad guys into jail?

So, what's the worst that could happen to rich people? Becoming poor people.

1.)
Just ramp up the fines and the sums that regulators are allowed to accept in out-of-court settlements: 200%
You steal a house worth $300,000 by falsifying documents, you pay $600,000 in fines (and give the house back, of course).
You manipulate stocks to make $10,000,000, you pay $20,000,000.
You launder $1,000,000,000 for a criminal organization, you pay $2,000,000,000.

2.)
If you get caught for the same type of crime a second time, the fine goes up to 300%.
Again? Make that 400%.
Seriously, again? How about 500%?

Just make sure that regulators CAN'T be nice to criminals.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No...... sendero Feb 2013 #1
In the end it's not their money so they don't care about the fines, putting them in jail works uponit7771 Feb 2013 #2
It's not one or the other, you can fine them and jail them at the same time. nt bemildred Feb 2013 #3
it should be both, imo. nt xchrom Feb 2013 #6
Precisely. Criminals get fines + jail time all the time. jsr Feb 2013 #9
a long jail sentence is a far greater deterrent than any fine. Scuba Feb 2013 #4
It's such a great deterrent, however... randome Feb 2013 #11
So we should not send people to jail because they'll just find more ways to game the system? Squinch Feb 2013 #16
I don't know. Maybe a heavy fine combined with removing said person from the same position... randome Feb 2013 #17
But why not jail? They committed crimes. You or I would go to jail if we did that. Squinch Feb 2013 #18
$600,000 in fines to a Bank? Ichingcarpenter Feb 2013 #5
To prevent cheating, you have to not only get rid of cheater, but stop other cheaters afterwards graham4anything Feb 2013 #7
"So, what's the worst that could happen to rich people? Becoming poor people. " ProSense Feb 2013 #8
Couldn't disagree more Cirque du So-What Feb 2013 #10
Bad idea... MrMickeysMom Feb 2013 #12
Jail everyone on the payroll. EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #13
Seems like bernie madoff is the only one to do jail time. mucifer Feb 2013 #14
Exactly Cirque du So-What Feb 2013 #15
Bernie Madoff was piker compared to these other bankers freethought Feb 2013 #19
Ask Bernie Madoff shanti Feb 2013 #20
100k people could've gone to jail under the robosigning scandal. joshcryer Feb 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elizabeth Warren is wrong...