Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How Likely is a War with Iran if President Obama is Re-elected? [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)10. Well,
Let me be clear, I think this is far better then the GOP entering the White House. Iran is a serious security problem and I trust the President to handle it and I think he will handle it by bring together allies and regional friends to deal with the problem . However, I would suggest that war is still a possibility with Iran, even with the re-election of the President.
Stating that fact doesn't mean that I love war. It means I am trying to describe the World as it is, not as I want it to be.
Stating that fact doesn't mean that I love war. It means I am trying to describe the World as it is, not as I want it to be.
...I don't know, you seem to have war and getting rid of war crimes laws on your mind.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002235322
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=236385
The President's statement:
And we will safeguard Americas own security against those who threaten our citizens, our friends, and our interests. Look at Iran. Through the power of our diplomacy, a world that was once divided about how to deal with Irans nuclear program now stands as one. The regime is more isolated than ever before; its leaders are faced with crippling sanctions, and as long as they shirk their responsibilities, this pressure will not relent.
Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal. (Applause.)
But a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible, and far better, and if Iran changes course and meets its obligations, it can rejoin the community of nations.
Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal. (Applause.)
But a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible, and far better, and if Iran changes course and meets its obligations, it can rejoin the community of nations.
Also, implying that there is more to Panetta's statement than standard boilerplate used in every negotiation ("There are no options off the table"
Do you think there should be a war with Iran?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We can't and won't do anything with Israel on this besides let them do it alone
BrentWil
Jan 2012
#15
Both are reliant on U.S. support and would draw us into the conflict.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2012
#21
I suspect they already have some and that other countries (like ours) already know it.
HopeHoops
Jan 2012
#37
I was thinking more along the lines of firing on one of the two carriers we have in the region.
HopeHoops
Jan 2012
#46
Guessing they will impose sanctions for 5 to 10 years first to soften the target before invading.
limpyhobbler
Jan 2012
#5
'Soften the target'. You mean 'kill a few hundred thousand innocent children for not good reason'.
sabrina 1
Jan 2012
#17
The Middle East is too unstable for sanctions to last even more than two years, the Iranian...
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#63
Is a weatherman who is tracking a Hurricane wishing for death and destruction?
BrentWil
Jan 2012
#27
It's more likely that that Israelis will launch a strike than the Arabs, IMO
Cali_Democrat
Jan 2012
#18
and i'm sick of people being willfully ignorant, blind and oblivious of a definite possibility
inna
Jan 2012
#42
Banging the drums isn't exactly the same as crying wolf and neither is the response
TheKentuckian
Jan 2012
#59
Fullscale war with Iran's been days away for ten years now around here. (nt)
Posteritatis
Jan 2012
#51
Pretty much. DU People used to tell me Kerry would invade Iran and bring back the draft.
emulatorloo
Jan 2012
#53
Between the Chimp & Obama admins, nothing has changed in regard to Iran policy
got root
Jan 2012
#54
It is zip. In 1976, Ford ran on a stealth campaign of "Carter will take us to war because Dems
McCamy Taylor
Jan 2012
#55
I don't think anyone is suggesting that the GOP would be a better choice to keep us out of Iran NT
BrentWil
Jan 2012
#56
Actually, it isn't. But if reading things into it makes you feel better, so be it NT
BrentWil
Jan 2012
#58
What people aren't considering here is the effect of the Arab Spring on the Middle East.
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#62
You're much more favorable than me, I put it at closer to 40%. A Republican? 100%.
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#61
Likely. But the possibility of an Iran confrontation with a Republican is also likely.
BlueIris
Jan 2012
#71
Ahmandinajad doesn't run the country and has very little power within the country NT
BrentWil
Jan 2012
#74