Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
9. The process needed to be shut down
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 11:24 AM
Feb 2013

Thomas Curry, head of the OCC since 2012 (it had an acting head since 2010), was the person Senator Warren addressed in the banking hearing. The process was costly and ineffective.

To accelerate the payments, the comptroller’s office decided to cut out the middlemen, the consultants, from the reviews. In a conference call last week, the government outlined a plan to use the lenders instead, according to people with direct knowledge of the discussion. Banks will now have to assess each loan for potential errors, which will help determine the size of the payments to homeowners.

<...>

Despite billing for roughly $2 billion in fees in the 14-month review, consultants examined only a sliver of the 500,000 complaints filed by homeowners, people involved in the matter said. Their efforts were stymied, in part, because regulators urged consultants to first scrutinize a random sample of the four million foreclosures before digging into specific homeowner complaints, the people involved said. The decision, the people said, may have undercut the scope of the settlement and potentially deprived homeowners of additional relief.

Consultants were also criticized for a faulty review process.

Some consulting firms, including the Promontory Financial Group, farmed out much of the work to contract employees. Others faced questions about their objectivity. The consultants, critics note, were paid billions of dollars by the same banks they were expected to police.

Some consultants say they sounded repeated alarms about the process. Last spring, a group of consulting firm executives met with comptroller officials in Washington to voice concerns that the reviews were too narrow, according to people with direct knowledge of the meetings....The review process, with its narrow focus, was created by the comptroller’s office in 2011, under previous leadership.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/big-banks-are-told-to-review-their-own-foreclosures/

When regulating agencies don't do their jobs, it really screws things up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Obama administration is in the banks' pockets. They will NEVER stand up for homeowners. forestpath Feb 2013 #1
Gee, what a shock. woo me with science Feb 2013 #2
I would have sworn that this was going to be Onion Angry Dragon Feb 2013 #3
Maybe on DU we could be our own jury for posts we make The Straight Story Feb 2013 #5
They're ASKING the banks to regulate their abuses? magellan Feb 2013 #4
Yes, let's have mortgage corporations police themselves. City Lights Feb 2013 #6
When is this softness to corporations going to end? ananda Feb 2013 #7
"bungled" Enrique Feb 2013 #8
The process needed to be shut down ProSense Feb 2013 #9
Assuming this is true, this is a lawyer's response. Baitball Blogger Feb 2013 #10
Lawyer's clients want to self-regulate. amandabeech Feb 2013 #19
kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #11
kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #12
par for the course liberal_at_heart Feb 2013 #13
Surprised Obama's DOJ doesn't throw the homeowners in jail for daring to make the banks look bad. forestpath Feb 2013 #14
kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #15
A uniquely TeaPubliKlan solution! TheKentuckian Feb 2013 #16
US justice is a joke! n/t L0oniX Feb 2013 #17
Kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #18
The prisoners run the penitentiary once again. n/t alp227 Feb 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Administration Asks...»Reply #9