Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ashley Judd's Arsenal...Mock her at your own risk, Mitch. [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)41. Go Ashley! The Turtle is afraid and he ought to be. Not only of Ashley Judd
but of the huge, newly formed Progressive Coalition who has named him as a target on which they will spend lots of money, (having learned from Republicans finally how to do it) to remove. So any Democrat who runs against him this time will not be depending only the Rahm Emanuels who often did not support Liberal candidates, she will have this coalition of dozens of organizations that actually WANT Liberal/Progressives in the Senate and have already gotten off to a great start financially.
I would love to see her beat the Turtle and not only rid the Senate of his horrible influence, but debunk the notion the Democrats can't win in Kentucky.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Very interesting post! Makes me wanna vote for her! Except it's not my state...or my party. nt
Honeycombe8
Feb 2013
#10
Ohhhh. I'm glad to hear it. For some reason, I thought she was a Republican. Maybe because
Honeycombe8
Feb 2013
#64
Elizabeth Warren was my ground-zero donation target last election; Ashley Judd will be next time
NBachers
Feb 2013
#30
Yeah, and I didn't take them seriously, either. Or Ronald Reagan. Or loads of other
MotherPetrie
Feb 2013
#50
Meh, I disagree. She only had points to make about the shallowness of celebrity gossip
MotherPetrie
Feb 2013
#58
Only because SHE was being cast in an unflattering light. That's what it was about.
MotherPetrie
Feb 2013
#69