Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
69. i work on a family farm and i have a degree in working on a family farm
Mon Feb 18, 2013, 03:06 AM
Feb 2013

i planted 250 acres of cover crops last fall by myself, have built many coops, and go to three farmer's markets.

permaculture and terminator- sure they go hand in hand- kill your neighbors crops, that's a sound plan!

the point is nobody knows what would happen, because it is so evil MONSANTO didn't use it- this makes it worse than DDT or PCBs or agent orange, which they merrily dispensed for years, causing billions of dollars of damage.

if they had been stupid or evil enough to force terminator instead of bt or roundup corn on 90%+ of US farmers, it could have wiped out the entire corn crop in north and south america in the last 8 years. is that a good enough start towards world famine?

another part of not knowing means corn pollen COULD contaminate other species, not just plants, but worms, bees, whatever. could reduce sperm counts by 90% worldwide, who the hell knows?

who the hell would want to find out? why even go there?

Will the Terminator spread to other plants?
http://www.psrast.org/terminexpl.htm
It is likely that Terminator will kill the seeds of neighboring plants of the same species, under certain conditions. However, the effects will be confined to the first generation, and will not be able to spread to other generations. The scenario might go like this: when farmers plant the Terminator seeds, the seeds already will have been treated with tetracycline, and thus the recombinase will have acted, and the toxin coding sequence will be next to the seed-specific promoter, and will be ready to act when the end of seed development comes around. The seeds will grow into plants, and make pollen. Every pollen grain will carry a ready-to-act toxin gene. If the Terminator crop is next to a field planted in a normal variety, and pollen is taken by insects or the wind to that field, any eggs fertilized by the Terminator pollen will now have one toxin gene. It will be activated late in that seed's development, and the seed will die. However, it is unlikely that the person growing the normal variety will be able to tell, because the seed will probably look normal. Only when that seed is planted, and doesn't germinate, will the change become apparent.

In most cases, the toxin gene will not be passed on any further, because dead plants don't reproduce. However, under certain conditions I will discuss later, it is possible for the toxin gene to be inherited.

In any case, dead seeds, where they occur, would be a serious problem for the farmer whose fields are close to the Terminator crop. How many seeds die will depend on the degree of cross-pollination, and that is influenced by the species of plant, the variety of crop, weather conditions, how close the fields are to each other, and so on. If many seeds die, it will make saving seed untenable for the adjacent farmer. Even if only a few seeds die, they will contain the toxin and any other proteins engineered into the Terminator-protected variety. These new "components" may make the seed unusable for certain purposes.

Will seeds containing the toxin made by Terminator be safe to eat?

In fact, the effects of the toxin on the uses of the seed are a serious question. This issue is discussed in the patent at the end of page 8. There the authors say that "in cotton that would be grown commercially only selected lethal genes could be used since these proteins could impact the final quality of seeds....If the seed is not a factor in the commercial value of a crop (e.g., in forage crops, ornamentals or plants grown for the floral industry) any lethal gene should be acceptable."

This is dangerously reductionist thinking, because people are not the only organisms that interact with seeds. In forage crops, for example, not all of the forage is always harvested before seeds are mature, depending on conditions. How will a particular toxin affect birds, insects, fungi and bacteria that eat or infect the seeds? If a forage crop with toxin-laden seeds is left in the field, and the seeds come in contact with the soil, how will that affect the ecology of soil organisms? These are important questions because a variety of specific organisms are necessary for the healthy growth of plants. Further, a floral or ornamental crop with Terminator may happen to grow near a related crop where the seeds are used, and if pollination occurs, the seeds will contain toxin without that farmer knowing. The toxin could end up in products without anyone's knowledge. For example, an ornamental sunflower could spread Terminator to an oilseed variety, and then the toxin could end up in edible oil or in sunflower seed meal.

Other potential problems with making novel toxins in edible seeds have to do with allergenicity. The RIP toxin described earlier may not be directly poisonous to animals, but may cause allergic reactions. If the seeds are being mixed with the general food supply, it will be difficult to trace this sort of effect.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good. LiberalEsto Feb 2013 #1
K & R Le Taz Hot Feb 2013 #2
k and r--bravo for this hero. niyad Feb 2013 #3
Good for him we can do it Feb 2013 #4
Good luck to him.... CanSocDem Feb 2013 #5
Riddle me this fasttense Feb 2013 #13
If Monsanto's patent sulphurdunn Feb 2013 #17
In 1999, Monsanto pledged not to commercialize terminator technology, and has kept that pledge on it farminator3000 Feb 2013 #18
"it could literally wipe out the planet, and not slowly" NickB79 Feb 2013 #31
"The scientific illiteracy, it burns." farminator3000 Feb 2013 #32
Just curious, how do you envision Terminator seed tech wiping out life on Earth? NickB79 Feb 2013 #33
how do you envision it not doing that? farminator3000 Feb 2013 #38
I grew up on a family farm and my degree is biochemistry NickB79 Feb 2013 #54
i work on a family farm and i have a degree in working on a family farm farminator3000 Feb 2013 #69
Failure to reproduce = extinction Viva_La_Revolution Feb 2013 #61
Ok I understand that terminator gene manipulation can be a Frankenstein monster but fasttense Feb 2013 #64
Give 'em hell. K&R Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2013 #6
The Consequences to Vernon Hugh Bowman (and most other small farmers) is just adding to the list of drynberg Feb 2013 #7
The same SCOTUS that allowed Citizens United? Are you serious? nt valerief Feb 2013 #14
Good luck, Farmer Bowman! City Lights Feb 2013 #8
GOOD! One Voice Feb 2013 #9
I so hope Monsanto loses this and loses bad. white_wolf Feb 2013 #10
me too! We Stand With Farmer Bowman! BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2013 #53
K & R !!! WillyT Feb 2013 #11
Good for him dbackjon Feb 2013 #12
Somebody's gotta do it... marions ghost Feb 2013 #15
Yeah, yeah, I know Monsanto's evil and all that customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #16
that's ridiculous. farminator3000 Feb 2013 #19
What I'd like to see customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #23
Those "ancient" farmers.... CanSocDem Feb 2013 #65
Yeah, yeah....Here's a link that might inspire you.... ReRe Feb 2013 #21
Look, I acknowledge the party line here customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #24
OK...so you're a troll ReRe Feb 2013 #28
Been here since the 1994 election customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #30
This site was made after the SCOTUS stole the 2000 election. joshcryer Feb 2013 #55
Sorry, a decade off, I meant 2004. customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #71
No worries, I actually realized that after my post. joshcryer Feb 2013 #72
no you don't, you are spewing it. farminator3000 Feb 2013 #34
No, but if you direct me to it customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #39
knock yourself out farminator3000 Feb 2013 #41
Every single post I've seen from you is nothing but rationalizing corporate control. white_wolf Feb 2013 #22
What I rationalize customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #27
but you don't farminator3000 Feb 2013 #35
I've just observed customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #37
but you haven't farminator3000 Feb 2013 #40
Interesting customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #43
there was a guy who was doing lettuce that cured diabetes, but Bayer 'disappeared' it farminator3000 Feb 2013 #46
“I was prepared to let them run over me,” Mr. Bowman said, “but I wasn’t getting out of the road.” farminator3000 Feb 2013 #20
Monsanto/NYTimes ReRe Feb 2013 #25
I'm with Bowman on this. He didn't rent the seeds. He bought them. Gorp Feb 2013 #26
That would be an interesting result: Monsanto patents null and void. Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #29
that would be the best result farminator3000 Feb 2013 #42
The Best of Luck to Vernon Hugh Bowman who I think Cha Feb 2013 #36
300 acres is PLENTY! farminator3000 Feb 2013 #44
Thanks for being Cha Feb 2013 #50
Good. I find the whole concept of terminator genes, in particular, terrifying Hekate Feb 2013 #45
What would happen if a sweeping decision is made by the Supreme Court? Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #47
a great cry of jubilation would echo across the plains? farminator3000 Feb 2013 #49
I do not believe that you are a farmer. Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #52
Crediting solely private R&D firms is kind of unfair. joshcryer Feb 2013 #58
Extrapolate that beyond '96. The trends continue. Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #63
I totally understand that. joshcryer Feb 2013 #66
try me. farminator3000 Feb 2013 #68
People like Norman Borlaug? joshcryer Feb 2013 #57
Good! I hope he wins!! DearHeart Feb 2013 #48
Fingers crossed MotherPetrie Feb 2013 #51
In the Schmeiser case "active participation" was cited. joshcryer Feb 2013 #56
The founding fathers would kick the snot bubbles outa Monsanto upi402 Feb 2013 #60
+1, they would look at this as a simple matter of property. joshcryer Feb 2013 #67
Monsanto et al are pure evil upi402 Feb 2013 #59
Onward to justice, Mr. Bowman Berlum Feb 2013 #62
I hope the farmer wins. Apophis Feb 2013 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Farmer’s Supreme Court Ch...»Reply #69