Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So, when will McCain be made to answer for arming the Benghazi rebels who attacked the US embassy? [View all]KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)16. He Playes The Corporate Media Like A Violin...

This dude has created his own "reality show" that he perpetuates daily in front of any microphone he can get to. I can't think of a week over the past 4 years he hasn't shown up on one Sunday show or another...or is having a press conference or whipping up some shit on the Senate floor. The guy knows the "squeaky wheel gets the grease" and whenever he his phone constantly rings.
He also knows how to intimidate the beltway stenographers. They all want to be Johnny's friend and look at his triades as him being "cranky"...yet they fall all over one another to book him, and Grumps makes sure either he or Little Linz is there to get the face time. He's gotten away with these "mavericky" games and will continue to do so as long as the fine folks of Arizona keep him in the Senate...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So, when will McCain be made to answer for arming the Benghazi rebels who attacked the US embassy? [View all]
bigtree
Feb 2013
OP
McCain's Benghazi obsession is that the US didn't fully follow-through and arm the Syrian rebels
leveymg
Feb 2013
#1
McCain is upset because we didn't arm Syrian rebels. Rand Paul is upset because he thinks we did.
pampango
Feb 2013
#14
She wouldn't make much of a poker player. Her response is pure "neither confirm nor deny."
leveymg
Feb 2013
#15
Biden and Donilon 'advised against it' and Rice was 'skeptical'. The article does not indicate that
pampango
Feb 2013
#28
Read these two sentences together, and that's what it says about Rice's position.
leveymg
Feb 2013
#30
Recall last May, Rice was pushing for Iraq-style US-NATO action outside a UNSC authorization.
leveymg
Feb 2013
#34
"Rice did not specify what 'actions' she meant." "There are fears that her words could mean
pampango
Feb 2013
#35
What else could Rice mean other than "the threat of military action"? That's certainly how they
leveymg
Feb 2013
#36
Most of the GOP critique is a sort of red herring, and only one publicly addressed the real issue.
leveymg
Feb 2013
#25
it's a bit clearer to me why the President's held off arming Syrian resistance fighters
bigtree
Feb 2013
#8
You're implying that we have a media that will hold him accountable.
ForgoTheConsequence
Feb 2013
#10