Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why the LAPD's Hunt for Dorner Is Indefensible [View all]
Salon / By David Cay Johnston
The hunt for Christopher Dorner, which injured innocent civilians, reveals how little the department has changed.
February 16, 2013
In hunting down Christopher J. Dorner, hell-bent on murderous revenge over being fired from the Los Angeles Police Department, officers twice fired without warning on three innocent civilians, wounding two of them.
That innocent people get shot by cops who think their own safety is paramount, whose actions show they value their own lives more than those of people they are sworn to protect, is part of a major problem in America that has not abated much despite decades of efforts to make policing more professional and less brutish. It is the policy of police departments that police cannot kill innocents to save themselves, in effect, that sometimes your sworn duty is to die. But, on the streets, it is far too often another story entirely.
The victims of this Feb. 7 police violence bore no resemblance to Dorner or his vehicle. The deranged Dorner drove a gray Nissan Titan pickup, while LAPD fired a fusillade into a bright blue Toyota Tacoma pickup from behind, while minutes later Torrance, Calif., police rammed a black Honda Ridgeline pickup and then fired three shots.
Dorner was a large, even hulking, black man. In the blue truck were two Hispanic women. Torrance police shot at a surfer, a white male slight in stature.
Luckily none of these innocents died, though one of the women was shot in the back.
http://www.alternet.org/why-lapds-hunt-dorner-indefensible?page=0%2C0
The hunt for Christopher Dorner, which injured innocent civilians, reveals how little the department has changed.
February 16, 2013
In hunting down Christopher J. Dorner, hell-bent on murderous revenge over being fired from the Los Angeles Police Department, officers twice fired without warning on three innocent civilians, wounding two of them.
That innocent people get shot by cops who think their own safety is paramount, whose actions show they value their own lives more than those of people they are sworn to protect, is part of a major problem in America that has not abated much despite decades of efforts to make policing more professional and less brutish. It is the policy of police departments that police cannot kill innocents to save themselves, in effect, that sometimes your sworn duty is to die. But, on the streets, it is far too often another story entirely.
The victims of this Feb. 7 police violence bore no resemblance to Dorner or his vehicle. The deranged Dorner drove a gray Nissan Titan pickup, while LAPD fired a fusillade into a bright blue Toyota Tacoma pickup from behind, while minutes later Torrance, Calif., police rammed a black Honda Ridgeline pickup and then fired three shots.
Dorner was a large, even hulking, black man. In the blue truck were two Hispanic women. Torrance police shot at a surfer, a white male slight in stature.
Luckily none of these innocents died, though one of the women was shot in the back.
http://www.alternet.org/why-lapds-hunt-dorner-indefensible?page=0%2C0
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And I have serious doubts that we'll have a fair accounting of their actions any time soon
MrScorpio
Feb 2013
#7
Depends on how much the city wants to pay the victims when they file suit.
geek tragedy
Feb 2013
#40
Right. They didn't want him to talk about how much he despised lesbians and his high school teacher.
randome
Feb 2013
#14
The article doesn't criticize what they did to Dorner. It criticizes what they did
geek tragedy
Feb 2013
#17
Why are people still writing articles about it? The credits have rolled on that one. nt
EastKYLiberal
Feb 2013
#10
Because the underlying issue of police abuse of power is much, much bigger than this case n/t
markpkessinger
Feb 2013
#49
Which is why I'm sure that they didn't want the Press to witness how they took him down
MrScorpio
Feb 2013
#18
Oh… So, accusations of racist behavior by the LAPD is just the stuff that fuels conspiracy theories?
MrScorpio
Feb 2013
#28
I'm merely recognizing the fact that there were other ex-LAPD who have supported his allegations
MrScorpio
Feb 2013
#34
You act as if racism allegations against the LAPD depended on his testimony.
geek tragedy
Feb 2013
#35
Again, the LAPD's response to Dorner's rampage and their subsequent handling of his accusations…
MrScorpio
Feb 2013
#41
You'll note that I more or less agree with you on the need to investigate the LAPD.
geek tragedy
Feb 2013
#42
Show me what in the OP prompted your massive verbiage? Noting in it suggests support of
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#44
What does that have to do with their opening fire, without warning, on various citizens?
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#38
and this thread is about what the cops did to citizens who were not Dorner. One issue.
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#46
GT must control all DU discussions on anything related to the LAPD/Dorner case.
shcrane71
Feb 2013
#54
No, that is attempted murder the career path should be discussed with the warden.
TheKentuckian
Feb 2013
#56
Indefenible and also sadly typical of LAPD and associated California law enforcment
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#37
Thanks for your excellent reporting and your additional input here, Mr. Johnston
MrScorpio
Feb 2013
#53