General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why this sudden push to rewrite history about the Iraq war? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)was not the case. There were two reports, one for the public and one available to members of Congress. We learned years ago that once those Senators who chose to look at the uncensored report read it, they knew they had been lied to. Sadly, several Senators chose not to read it and then claimed they had been fooled. This all went on in real time and Sen. Graham, I believe recorded all these events as they happened.
Also, Col. Wilkerson, Colin Powell's aide, has corroborated that it was known that Saddam Hussein had no WMDs by the time they went to the UN.
It is revision of history to claim otherwise. I remember well the reports at the time and if ordinary people like me could access this information, then I'm sorry, but there are simply no excuses. Any Senator who did know the facts, did not know them because they refused to read the reports that were made available to them in order to be able to claim they were 'fooled'.