General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NEVER FORGET [View all]JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)United Nations Inspection Team. Here is his report of that date:
Inspections in Iraq resumed on 27 November 2002. In matters relating to process, notably prompt access to sites, we have faced relatively few difficulties and certainly much less than those that were faced by UNSCOM in the period 1991 to 1998. This may well be due to the strong outside pressure.
Some practical matters, which were not settled by the talks, Dr. ElBaradei and I had with the Iraqi side in Vienna prior to inspections or in resolution 1441 (2002), have been resolved at meetings, which we have had in Baghdad. Initial difficulties raised by the Iraqi side about helicopters and aerial surveillance planes operating in the no-fly zones were overcome. This is not to say that the operation of inspections is free from frictions, but at this juncture we are able to perform professional no-notice inspections all over Iraq and to increase aerial surveillance.
. . . .
As I noted on 14 February, intelligence authorities have claimed that weapons of mass destruction are moved around Iraq by trucks and, in particular, that there are mobile production units for biological weapons. The Iraqi side states that such activities do not exist. Several inspections have taken place at declared and undeclared sites in relation to mobile production facilities. Food testing mobile laboratories and mobile workshops have been seen, as well as large containers with seed processing equipment. No evidence of proscribed activities have so far been found. Iraq is expected to assist in the development of credible ways to conduct random checks of ground transportation.
There have been reports, denied from the Iraqi side, that proscribed activities are conducted underground. Iraq should provide information on any underground structure suitable for the production or storage of WMD. During inspections of declared or undeclared facilities, inspection teams have examined building structures for any possible underground facilities. In addition, ground penetrating radar equipment was used in several specific locations. No underground facilities for chemical or biological production or storage were found so far.
http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/SC7asdelivered.htm
The Bush administration moved quickly to make certain that the UN Inspection Team would not provide its ultimate verdict that Iraq had no WMDs before George Bush and his co-conspirators (seriously) could send troops into Iraq.
---
From the NYTimes, July 2010:
Mr. Blix, the Swedish diplomat who led the United Nations body that scoured Iraq for traces of Saddam Husseins banned weapons program, used the word absurd on several occasions to describe American arguments for going to war. He also described Britain, the United States main ally in the invasion, as a prisoner on the American train.
. . . .
Mr. Blix, 82, is customarily courtly, in the way of the Cambridge-educated international lawyer he was before he became Swedens foreign minister in the late 1970s. But appearing before the British inquiry as the first non-British witness to speak in a public session, his quiet, detailed account of the weapons inspections and the decision to go to war before inspections were completed was punctuated by acerbic observations about the American role.
He repeatedly referred to the American president as Bush, without using his title or an honorific, while referring to Tony Blair, the British prime minister who joined the invasion, as Mr. Blair. He criticized both leaders, as he has before, for resting their case for going to war on intelligence about Iraqs weapons programs that he described as poor.
I have never questioned the good faith of Mr. Blair, or Mr. Bush, he said at one point. What I questioned was the good judgment, particularly of Bush, but also about Mr. Blair to some extent.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/world/europe/28blix.html?ref=hansblix&_r=0