General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chime in if you remember how the "press" in this country pushed for war [View all]ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)In the feverish nationalism after 9-11, none dared challenge King George Il's excuse to invade anywhere. Not most Democrats, not the media, few people or entities dared. And it cost us dearly in lives and dollars and more costs that have yet to be realized.
I remember after 9-11 happened, I thought: "I hope this asshole (bu$h) doesn't go off half-cocked on some cowboy vigilanti-type war somewhere."
True to form, and predictable - that's just what he and his merry band of psychopaths did. Then we found out the little turd planned on invading Iraq the day he was appointed King. And that gave fuel to the 9-11 LIHOP theories. He was just aching for an excuse - any excuse - to go over there and finish the job Poppy didn't finish, avenge Poppy, get control of the oil, whatever their excuse was. But he knew the American people would not sign on to a war just for the war games or profiteering fun of it. He needed an excuse. 9-11 gave him that and the rest he / they invented out of thin air.
I still find the entire thing inexcusable. Disgusting. Immoral. The job of the media is to CHECK corrupt power, not enable it.