General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Please Be Brave Enough To Respond To This Poll [View all]white_wolf
(6,257 posts)In terms of the Patriot Act, drone strikes, and all of the other current issues involving security vs liberty I firmly stand on the side of liberty and oppose all of those measures and I do not propose trading liberty for security. However, I would like to point out that anyone who believes in government is willing to trade some liberty for security. After all, isn't that the whole reason for government in the first place? I'm not sure I agree full with his sentiment, but I think Lenin was at least in the right direction when he wrote "Where the State exists there can be no freedom. Where there is freedom there is no State." Perhaps Lenin went too far in that statement, but I think it is something worth considering at the very least. Can we be free while there is a state? If we can, how do we do that and if we can't then what liberties are we willing to give up to be secure?
Sorry, I know this probably wasn't the intent of your post, but I just felt like getting philosophical for a moment.